<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>132349</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-05-05 07:06 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-text/{poppler,poppler-bindings}-0.5.1-r1 stabilization request + &gt;=app-text/evince-0.5.1 + app-text/xpdf-3.01-r8</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-18 18:12:32 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>134341</dependson>
          <blocked>132213</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>carlo@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>printing@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>nucleos@free.fr</cc>
    
    <cc>qt@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>carlo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-05 07:06:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>We need it stable for stabilization of KDE 3.5. As everyone knows this affects multiple packages, so the stabilization needs to happen coordinated. KDE stabilization is not happening /that/ soon, but it helps if everyone is prepared.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-05 07:17:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>app-text/poppler-0.5.1-r1
app-text/xpdf-3.01-r8
app-text/poppler-bindings-0.5.1-r1
&gt;app-text/evince-0.5.1

those need to go stable simultaneously to avoid compile-problems</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caleb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-10 05:45:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Does anyone object to asking the arch teams to mark stable?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-10 08:54:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>no objections, go ahead</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weeve@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-12 15:46:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>For stablizing poppler-bindigs, is it known which version of qt-4* the maintainers would prefer be stablized?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-20 00:56:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>please, comment on what version of qt-4* should go stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-20 01:50:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>qt herd: qt4 is needed in a stable version because poppler-bindings has a qt4 useflag and repoman needs all depends as stable. What version of qt-4* should go stable?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caleb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-22 04:34:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>4.1.2 is fine to go stable in my opinion.  I&apos;ll probably be opening a bug in a day or so for the request.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-25 09:20:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This bug is set as a blocker for bug #132213 and I&apos;ve seen no request yet for marking any version of Qt4 stable.  Should we ignore this bug or should we be markign Qt4 stable?

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caleb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-25 09:24:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sorry

qt4 is okay to mark stable - I just forgot to open a bug yet.  Will do so shortly.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-25 12:44:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Uhh... so I marked all of this stable, including qt4, which seems to work... I guess... anyway, x86 is done once you get around to filing the qt4 bug... =]</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>caleb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-25 12:47:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Qt4 bug is at #134341</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-26 07:26:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 done... =]</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chrb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-28 02:35:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The recently marked stable poppler-0.5.1-r1 fails to compile. Please see bug #134601. poppler-0.5.2 compiles ok.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weeve@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-29 12:47:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>SPARC is done.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-18 18:12:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>long done</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>