<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>130529</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-04-19 15:06 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>lvm2 2.02.05.ebuild stabilization bug</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-09-07 09:43:10 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>rocket@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>ia64@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>dhp_gentoo@doublehp.org</cc>
    
    <cc>ia64@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>m.debruijne@matrict.nl</cc>
    
    <cc>tsabi-gentoo@tsabi.hu</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rocket@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-19 15:06:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I know this has only been in the tree for a short period of time.  However, this package has been stable upstream for quite some time and it is needed to resolve a device-mapper upgrade downgrade circular dependancy issue.  I have masked the clvm,cman,gulm use flags from all arches except x86 so the clustering aspects of this ebuild should not be enabled and need to be stabilized at this time.  If you guys need anything let me know.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rocket@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-21 12:42:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Updating this to the newest lvm2 with the vgid parsing bug fixed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-22 18:46:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>How do I test all of the clustering on x86?

To mark lvm2 stable here on x86 I also need to mark the following, correct?

M ccs/ccs-1.01.00.ebuild
M cman/cman-1.01.00.ebuild
M cman-headers/cman-headers-1.01.00.ebuild
M dlm/dlm-1.01.00.ebuild
M dlm-headers/dlm-headers-1.01.00.ebuild
M gulm/gulm-1.00.00.ebuild
M magma/magma-1.01.00.ebuild

I&apos;ve tested device-mapper and lvm2 in a virtual machine and they appear fine, but the clustering stuff is beyond my extremely limited knowlege of lvm.  Some assistance would be appreciated.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-24 07:01:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>pwn3d!
hppa and sparc stable.
Chris: you&apos;ll probably need GFS and spread the thing across two or more boxes, to get an idea just see http://linux.sys-con.com/read/166309.htm
And that&apos;s the reason i became a biatch and said i doubted some arch teams really tested clustering as it should be done.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rocket@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-24 11:07:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>bumping this to 2.02.05 as it contains everything that .04-r1 had plus a fix for
invalidating a cache.

 &quot;Invalidate cache if composition of VG changed externally&quot;

This .05 release is the official response to the broken .03 and .04 version of lvm and was released to fix both the bug listed above and the 
&quot;Fix vgid string termination in recent cache code.&quot; problem that the patch in .04-r1 resolved.


</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-25 07:27:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Added sparc and hppa back for comment #4</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-25 11:48:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>sparc stable, i&apos;ll do hppa later.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-25 17:08:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, x86 is done... and for the record, you suck.  :P</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kumba@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-26 20:03:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The mips team doth annoint this bug with the mips keyword of stability +1.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-01 04:22:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gustavoz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-03 07:25:16 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hppa stable.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>mabi@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-26 02:35:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marked stable by hansmi, thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dhp_gentoo@doublehp.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-06-09 04:55:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on Alpha (see bug #136172 )</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tsabi-gentoo@tsabi.hu</who>
            <bug_when>2006-07-06 10:47:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Pls look at #132972 bug. I use ~amd64 now with the most newest packages, and it apperas there.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>thedude0001@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-19 15:29:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Taking this off our conscience since Kugelfang marked it stable on amd64 a while ago...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-30 01:28:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha done, arm/s390 don&apos;t have this even keyworded. Sending to ia64 folks.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rocket@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-09-07 09:43:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>2.02.06 is stable .. this is no longer needed...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>