127676 2006-03-26 15:01 0000 STLport-5.0.2 --with-boost configure option 2006-04-09 12:10:17 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Library 2006.0 All Linux RESOLVED FIXED http://stlport.sourceforge.net/News.shtml P2 enhancement --- 1 h.mth@web.de cpp@gentoo.org h.mth@web.de 2006-03-26 15:01:24 0000 Since STLport-5.0.2 there is a --with-boost configure option. Please add a boost useflag. Or alternatively hardwire one way. Thanks! h.mth@web.de 2006-03-26 15:52:46 0000 Created an attachment (id=83198) disable boost link, add extra cxxflags Why I disable boost link? I have a strange OOo2 issue which seems to be sourced from STLport<->Boost. I will see after recompile of OOo2. Why I tweak the CXXFLAGS thing? It did not care for the extra CXXFLAGS before. h.mth@web.de 2006-03-29 04:28:55 0000 Ok, my OOo2 error is unrelated. However, any reasons not to push into Portage? halcy0n@gentoo.org 2006-04-08 20:59:00 0000 Agreed, boost doesn't look too useful right now. Thanks a lot. h.mth@web.de 2006-04-09 03:42:58 0000 Do I misunderstand something? You say that boost does not look too useful right now but then you enable it in the ebuild? Shouldn't there be '--without-boost'? halcy0n@gentoo.org 2006-04-09 12:10:17 0000 Nope, I'm just an idiot. thanks for catching that :) 83198 2006-03-26 15:52 0000 disable boost link, add extra cxxflags STLport-5.0.2-boost.diff text/plain LS0tIGRldi1saWJzL1NUTHBvcnQvU1RMcG9ydC01LjAuMi5lYnVpbGQub3JpZwkyMDA2LTAzLTI3 IDAwOjQ0OjEyLjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDIwMAorKysgZGV2LWxpYnMvU1RMcG9ydC9TVExwb3J0LTUu MC4yLmVidWlsZAkyMDA2LTAzLTI3IDAwOjQwOjI3LjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDIwMApAQCAtMzYsOSAr MzYsMTIgQEAKIH0KIAogc3JjX2NvbXBpbGUoKSB7Ci0JZXhwb3J0IE9QVD0ke0NYWEZMQUdTfQor CWNkICR7U30vYnVpbGQvbGliIHx8IGRpZSAiY2QgZmFpbGVkIgorCS4vY29uZmlndXJlIFwKKwkJ LS13aXRoLWV4dHJhLWN4eGZsYWdzPSIke0NYWEZMQUdTfSIgXAorCQktLXdpdGhvdXQtYm9vc3Qg XAorCQl8fCBkaWUgIkNvbmZpZ3VyZSBmYWlsZWQiCiAJZW1ha2UgXAotCQktQyBidWlsZC9saWIg XAogCQktZiBnY2MubWFrIFwKIAkJZGVwZW5kIGFsbCB8fCBkaWUgIkNvbXBpbGUgZmFpbGVkIgog fQo=