<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>127162</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-03-22 02:13 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Linux Kernel Netfilter do_replace() Local Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (CVE-2006-0038)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-04-17 06:41:48 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Kernel</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17178/info</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>christian@bricart.de</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>jaervosz@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>vserver-devs@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>christian@bricart.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-22 02:13:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Quoting SecurityFocus:

The Linux kernel is susceptible to a remote buffer-overflow vulnerability. This issue is due to the kernel&apos;s failure to properly bounds-check user-supplied input before using it in a memory copy operation.

This issue allows remote attackers to overwrite kernel memory with arbitrary data, potentially allowing them to execute malicious machine code in the context of affected kernels. This vulnerability facilitates the complete compromise of affected computers.

Linux kernel versions prior to 2.6.16 in the 2.6 series are affected by this issue.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>christian@bricart.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-22 03:36:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Harald Welte (netfilter core team) commented on this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/netfilter-announce@lists.netfilter.org/msg00059.html

It seems that the bug is NOT remote exploitable.
So I removed &quot;remote&quot; from summary and decreased serverity to &quot;major&quot;</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-27 13:16:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This might affect openvz-sources/vserver-sources; maintainers please confirm... No security risk otherwise.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-27 13:28:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 127216 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hollow@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-29 07:02:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>regarding vserver only those guests with CAP_NET_ADMIN might be affected which is off by default.

regarding openvz as per upstream it is not an issue</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-15 13:14:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>@hollow: Understood, can you please patch the 2.6.15 series for this issue? Or possibly send the 2.6.16 series to stable.

Thanks!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-16 10:59:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Upon further inspection with phreak, vserver is not affected by this (they implement the code themselves differently).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>hollow@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-16 19:15:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ok, good, since the 2.6.16 version will still take some time i&apos;m afraid..</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>plasmaroo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-17 06:41:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>openvz also not affected, so this bug can be closed :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>