<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>126433</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-03-16 08:24 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-office/openoffice{-bin}-2.0.2 fixes heap overflow in included curl</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-03-27 10:07:43 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59032</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>B2 [glsa] DerCorny</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>carlo@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>bugreports@tittel.net</cc>
    
    <cc>openoffice@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>carlo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-16 08:24:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59032</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-16 08:26:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>arches please test and mark stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>metalgod@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-16 09:18:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on amd64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wolf31o2@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-16 11:44:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>...and he looked down upon openoffice-bin and saw that it was stable... and then there was much rejoicing... (stable on x86)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-17 01:53:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ready for glsa</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-17 04:41:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>mhh, wait a second: whats up with normal openoffice? There is a curl useflag and it deps to curl, but does it really link to the external curl of gentoo (fixed long ago) or does it use the one shipped with openoffice?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-17 06:13:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Indeed, old builds of openoffice-2.0.1 should be vulnerable too if you didn&apos;t use the curl-use-flag (cause in this case the internal curl is being used for the build). I removed this use-flag yesterday, and we now hard-depend on the external curl, so for someone doing a fresh build, this is no issue anymore.

Do you want to do me a revision bump (without changes) so that everyone gets it? Think this would be the best solution, as 2.0.2 is not in the condition to go stable on most archs.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-17 06:19:15 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>yes, please revbump it</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>suka@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-17 08:38:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;ve revision-bumped openoffice-2.0.1, the old ebuild is still in there but is not vulnerable anymore cause of the aformentioned change I did yesterday.

Also I&apos;ve removed openoffice-bin-2.0.1 from the tree, so I think everything should be set for the GLSA.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-17 10:15:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>openoffice-2.0.1-r1 is stable, ready for GLSA

Fixed versions :
&gt;=openoffice-2.0.1-r1
&gt;=openoffice-bin-2.0.2</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dercorny@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-27 10:07:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200603-25

Thanks everybody.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>