<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>123972</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-02-24 12:01 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Please mark stable qemu-* 0.8.0</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-08-06 09:06:56 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>lu_zero@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>lu_zero@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>sgala@apache.org</cc>
    
    <cc>tchiwam@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lu_zero@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-24 12:01:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;d like to clean up qemu with all the ancient cruft

mark both qemu-user and qemu-softmmu with the qemu metabuild or just what works.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>sgala@apache.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-28 08:29:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I got this error compiling 0.80 here:

inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm&apos;

in this line:

    __asm__ __volatile__ (&quot;stwbrx %1,0,%2&quot; : &quot;=m&quot; (*(uint32_t *)ptr) : &quot;r&quot; (v), &quot;r&quot; (ptr));

0.7.2 is building right here.

Any clue?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lu_zero@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-28 08:40:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>this night hopefully I&apos;ll check the issue, seems different issues are related to different gcc versions...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chriswhite@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-10 17:44:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>lu_zero:

Wow, that&apos;s one heck of a night there ;p.  Anyways, any word on the bug or do we need to sit back and hang tight while you deal with more stuff?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lu_zero@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-11 04:01:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I tried to come up with something but got no positive results...

I&apos;ll check a cvs snapshot since got requested already </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-28 22:48:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>So...what&apos;s going on with this? :)  Should we just wait until you have another version for us to mark?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>lu_zero@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-28 22:54:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>if you can come up with a patch for your arch in order to mark it x86, I&apos;m fine</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chriswhite@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-29 00:08:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 stable. I didn&apos;t get the supposed compiler error at all.

&lt;cpw&gt; ok now then
* cpw gets out the spiritual beads
&lt;cpw&gt; plzdunbreakthxbye
&lt;cpw&gt; alright, that should do it</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tchiwam@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-18 03:53:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I got qemu 0.8.0 working for a while using amd64. I am using it nearly everyday at work with windows XP and 2000 as guests.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dang@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-19 12:54:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 done.  Sorry for the delay.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>fauli@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-08-06 09:06:56 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I close this, all arches have stabilised...please beat me if I am wrong.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>