<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>123856</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-02-23 13:57 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>libgsf-sharp 0.7 requires libgsf-gnome-1.pc in pkg-config dir; not installed</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-04-23 10:51:37 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>gabebw@gmail.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>joem@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>dsd@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>henrique.ferreiro@gmail.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gabebw@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-23 13:57:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>When I emerge gsf-sharp 0.7, it fails with

checking for GSF... configure: error: Package requirements (libgsf-1 &gt;= 1.13 libgsf-1 &lt; 1.14 libgsf-gnome-1 &gt;= 1.13 libgsf-gnome-1 &lt; 1.14) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively you may set the GSF_CFLAGS and GSF_LIBS environment variables
to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
more details.

A simple &quot;cp libgsf-1.pc libgsf-gnome-1.pc&quot; in /usr/share/pkgconfig fixes it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gabebw@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-23 13:58:08 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)
&gt; When I emerge gsf-sharp 0.7, it fails with
&gt; 
&gt; checking for GSF... configure: error: Package requirements (libgsf-1 &gt;= 1.13
&gt; libgsf-1 &lt; 1.14 libgsf-gnome-1 &gt;= 1.13 libgsf-gnome-1 &lt; 1.14) were not met.
&gt; Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
&gt; installed software in a non-standard prefix.
&gt; 
&gt; Alternatively you may set the GSF_CFLAGS and GSF_LIBS environment variables
&gt; to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
&gt; more details.
&gt; 
&gt; A simple &quot;cp libgsf-1.pc libgsf-gnome-1.pc&quot; in /usr/share/pkgconfig fixes it.
&gt; 

Err. Just realized that the title says libgsf-sharp. That should be gsf-sharp. Sorry.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dsd@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-23 14:45:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Oops. We do patch away the requirement but I forgot to run autoconf in the ebuild.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dsd@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-02 05:05:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed the ebuild, thanks for reporting.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-24 00:24:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 127368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>foltra@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-23 10:51:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; *** Bug 127368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
&gt; 

but it&apos;s not.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>