<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>123066</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-02-16 11:16 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>media-tv/mythtv : bump to 0.19</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-05-22 22:10:17 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>127811</dependson>
    
    <dependson>127812</dependson>
    
    <dependson>127813</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>koon@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>cardoe@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>amd64@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>cardoe@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>jesse@boldandbusted.com</cc>
    
    <cc>ppc@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>x86@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-16 11:16:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Separated from bug 115760 for stable marking
Ebuild for 0.19 is in, please test and mark stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-16 11:17:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ccing maintainer for info.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-18 03:19:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Little quick on the gun to mark 0.19 stable, I&apos;ve only just added it a week ago and I&apos;ve fixed the most recent bug in it yesterday.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-18 04:46:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Then happy pretesting :) Let us know when it&apos;s OK to mark stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-07 13:26:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Cardoe: due to the pending security issue, I guess it&apos;s time to test for stable, if you&apos;re OK with it...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-11 03:12:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>In absence of comments, calling arches now. Please test and mark stable</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-13 21:33:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well now that I know what the flaw is... it turns out that MythTV doesn&apos;t use the ffmpeg code in question.... but either way.. 0.19_p9163-r1 is going stable on x86 (per Halcy0n&apos;s test request) and on ppc (per me)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-13 21:39:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Actually, MythTV 0.19 depends aren&apos;t marked stable on either x86 or ppc platforms...

[&apos;&gt;=media-libs/libiec61883-1.0.0&apos;, &apos;&gt;=sys-libs/libavc1394-0.5.0&apos;, &apos;&gt;=sys-libs/libraw1394-1.2.0&apos;]

I don&apos;t have a way to test on PPC or x86 for these libs. No firewire stuff here.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-14 09:14:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>No longer a security issue, then.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-28 21:12:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ppc has marked all of the deps stable, is this still a stabilization request?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-29 01:06:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;d say no. Closing, feel free to reopen if you disagree</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-29 08:49:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yes.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-04-29 22:53:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Okay, one more question:

  14 Mar 2006; Doug Goldstein &lt;cardoe@gentoo.org&gt;
  mythtv-0.19_p9163-r1.ebuild:
  Marking stable on ppc and x86

I just wondering how that got in the changelog, since it didn&apos;t happen (it&apos;s still ~ppc).  But anyway, is that the version you&apos;d like us to stablize?  You can also do it yourself if you feel like it cardoe. :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-10 20:37:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Can anyone actually test the firewire stuff with mythtv?  If not, I say we drop it so that we can mark this stable minus that feature since no one can verify its stability at all.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-17 14:49:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Cardoe: what are we going to do with this?  We can&apos;t test the functionality of this to ensure it really is stable, nor can I find anyone that has the hardware to test it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-17 18:36:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Halc0yn: I&apos;ve been super busy at work. I&apos;ve been meaning to work on this. I actually found someone today that has it working in production on a x86 box. He says he&apos;s only got a few things marked ~x86. He&apos;s going to get me some more details. I think he&apos;ll do so fairly quickly considering I interviewed him for a job today.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-17 19:07:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Awesome.  If it works for him, feel free to mark everything.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-22 22:10:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Bump has been finally done!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>