<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>122890</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-02-15 02:05 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-vim/gentoo-syntax-20051221-r1 does not highlight virtual/* in package.*</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-11-05 22:24:38 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>InSVN</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>148985</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>jer@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>vim@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>pete4abw@comcast.net</cc>
    
    <cc>sebastian.noack@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>tupone@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-15 02:05:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>NT</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-15 02:08:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yeah, it looks for the hyphen for sanity reasons. I guess that that isn&apos;t really doable any more. There&apos;re a few more places where this is an issue.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-15 02:51:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>package.mask, package.unmask and package.use are affected as well.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pete4abw@comcast.net</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-01 07:06:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>May be related. In this snippet from the gcc-3.4.5.ebuild, after the # comment character, as soon as the &apos; is noticed, everything becomes colored as if it is quoted instead of being treated as a comment. This coloring continues until the   &apos; at the last line of the snippet. Once before, I reported a quoting issue and CM reported it was an upstream issue. This may be too. Sorry if this is bugspam or if this does not belong as part of this bug.

		mips)
			# If mips, and we DON&apos;T want multilib, then rig gcc to only use n32 OR n64
			if ! is_multilib; then
				use n32 &amp;&amp; epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.1/gcc-3.4.1-mips-n32only.patch
				use n64 &amp;&amp; epatch ${FILESDIR}/3.4.1/gcc-3.4.1-mips-n64only.patch
			fi

			# Patch forward-ported from a gcc-3.0.x patch that adds -march=r10000 and
			# -mtune=r10000 support to gcc (Allows the compiler to generate code to
			# take advantage of R10k&apos;s second ALU, perform shifts, etc..
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-01 14:21:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yeah, this one&apos;s unrelated. It&apos;ll get fixed in -r1, which will be whenever Bram gets back to me on another bug.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-09-16 08:17:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>No change in -r1. And hey, did -r1 just get bumped straight to stable a couple of days ago?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tupone@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-09-16 09:53:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yeah, I put a fix in -r1. Fix was very trivial, as you can eventually see.
I&apos;m not in the vim herds, but I had that fix pending. I did ask some months ago to put the fix on, and I again re-asked recently.
Both time I got a yes, please.
I had permission to put it in.

Maybe I have violated some policy about arch keyword, but in the game team, where I belong, is used to not ~ the arch keywords if the change is a fix, not an enhacement, and is trivial. 

Hope is ok.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pioto@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-05 11:52:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 142846 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pioto@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-05 12:24:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This has been fixed in the gentoo-syntax svn repo, and will be included in the next release.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pioto@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-11-05 22:24:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Fixed in app-vim/gentoo-syntax-20061006</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>