<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>122553</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2006-02-12 06:08 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>wpa_supplicant check or warn in madwifi-driver pkg_postinst</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-02-17 05:51:14 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>2005.1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>InCVS</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>chrb@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mobile@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chrb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-12 06:08:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Can you please add a warning or even better, some check that the  madwifi/wpa_supplicant versions match? Would&apos;ve saved some time... appears I&apos;m not the first to be caught out (http://madwifi.org/ticket/386). Thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-13 03:01:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>There is already a notice about this in wpa_supplicant (and hostapd). Would you like one in madwifi-driver as well?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chrb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-13 04:11:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yes because the relationship goes both ways - if madwifi-driver gets version bumped and recompiled, the user needs to recompile wpa_supplicant.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-17 05:51:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Added a note about this to the ebuilds in CVS. Thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>