121037 2006-01-31 04:26 0000 Please resolve bitbake/bitbake-svn inconsistencies 2006-02-02 14:50:53 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2701&release_id=5840 P2 enhancement --- 1 radek@podgorny.cz embedded@gentoo.org radek@podgorny.cz 2006-01-31 04:26:08 0000 The current version of bitbake in portage is 0 which sounds weird to me. According to berlios, the latest version is clearly 1.2.1 so please put versioned ebuild into portage. Thanks... jakub@gentoo.org 2006-01-31 04:33:05 0000 bitbake is a live subversion ebuild, i.e. - uses files from bitbake svn trunk. No version bumps required here. radek@podgorny.cz 2006-01-31 04:37:52 0000 I thought svn/cvs ebuild are against gentoo policy. So, please see attached ebuild for version 1.2.1 and rename bitbake to bitbake-svn. radek@podgorny.cz 2006-01-31 04:38:41 0000 Created an attachment (id=78558) bitbake-1.2.1.ebuild vapier@gentoo.org 2006-01-31 07:10:26 0000 they are heavily discouraged bitbake generally doesnt do releases hence a live svn ebuild was added instead (in fact the ebuild was made almost a year before their first "release") i dont see much value in adding the 1.2.1 version, but i will rename the 0 to 9999 so people dont get confused radek@podgorny.cz 2006-01-31 07:28:06 0000 Well, why not add bitbake-1.2.1 and bitbake-svn-0? I'm using 1.2.1 without problems. I mean, you'll get problems when you provide only svn version since when someone downloads it when it's in broken state, gentoo gets flamed. :-( Providing ebuild for release version is a sure thing (in means of working state). Anyway, I can try to write to bitbake developers and ask them to make a release... radek@podgorny.cz 2006-01-31 09:10:37 0000 Created an attachment (id=78575) bitbake-1.3.2.ebuild This is an ebuild for version 1.3.2 which is the latest stable. Very close to what you get when you pull it from svn. radek@podgorny.cz 2006-01-31 09:21:31 0000 I've had a conversation with the devs and they said there will be more releases coming so it imho makes sense to keep ebuilds for released versions... vapier@gentoo.org 2006-02-02 14:50:53 0000 having sep packages for livesvn and releases is a waste of space moved 0 to 9999, then cleaned up and added 1.3.2 to portage 78558 2006-01-31 04:38 0000 bitbake-1.2.1.ebuild bitbake-1.2.1.ebuild text/plain IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA1IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk ZXI6IC92YXIvY3Zzcm9vdC9nZW50b28teDg2L2Rldi1lbWJlZGRlZC9iaXRiYWtlL2JpdGJha2Ut MC5lYnVpbGQsdiAxLjUgMjAwNS8wOC8wNyAyMzowODozOCB3b3JtbyBFeHAgJAoKaW5oZXJpdCBl dXRpbHMKCkRFU0NSSVBUSU9OPSJwYWNrYWdlIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgdG9vbCBmb3IgT3BlbkVtYmVk ZGVkIgpIT01FUEFHRT0iaHR0cDovL2RldmVsb3Blci5iZXJsaW9zLmRlL3Byb2plY3RzL2JpdGJh a2UvIgpTUkNfVVJJPSJodHRwOi8vZG93bmxvYWQuYmVybGlvcy5kZS8ke1BOfS8ke1B9LnRhci5n eiIKCkxJQ0VOU0U9IkdQTC0yIgpTTE9UPSIwIgpLRVlXT1JEUz0ifng4NiIKSVVTRT0iIgoKREVQ RU5EPSJkZXYtbGFuZy9weXRob24iCgpzcmNfaW5zdGFsbCgpIHsKCXB5dGhvbiBzZXR1cC5weSBp bnN0YWxsIC0tcm9vdD0iJHtEfSIgfHwgZGllICJzZXR1cCBmYWlsZWQiCn0K 78575 2006-01-31 09:10 0000 bitbake-1.3.2.ebuild bitbake-1.3.2.ebuild text/plain IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA1IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k ZXIgdGhlIHRlcm1zIG9mIHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSB2MgojICRIZWFk ZXI6IC92YXIvY3Zzcm9vdC9nZW50b28teDg2L2Rldi1lbWJlZGRlZC9iaXRiYWtlL2JpdGJha2Ut MC5lYnVpbGQsdiAxLjUgMjAwNS8wOC8wNyAyMzowODozOCB3b3JtbyBFeHAgJAoKaW5oZXJpdCBl dXRpbHMKCkRFU0NSSVBUSU9OPSJwYWNrYWdlIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQgdG9vbCBmb3IgT3BlbkVtYmVk ZGVkIgpIT01FUEFHRT0iaHR0cDovL2RldmVsb3Blci5iZXJsaW9zLmRlL3Byb2plY3RzL2JpdGJh a2UvIgpTUkNfVVJJPSJodHRwOi8vaGFuZGhlbGRzLm9yZy9+emVja2UvZG93bmxvYWRzLyR7UE59 LyR7UH0udGFyLmd6IgoKTElDRU5TRT0iR1BMLTIiClNMT1Q9IjAiCktFWVdPUkRTPSJ+eDg2IgpJ VVNFPSIiCgpERVBFTkQ9ImRldi1sYW5nL3B5dGhvbiIKCnNyY19pbnN0YWxsKCkgewoJcHl0aG9u IHNldHVwLnB5IGluc3RhbGwgLS1yb290PSIke0R9IiB8fCBkaWUgInNldHVwIGZhaWxlZCIKfQo=