117505 2006-01-02 15:51 0000 Stabling of gtk / pango / glib / cairo / atk 2006-11-11 19:35:34 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 112951 118106 118722 1 allanonjl@gentoo.org gnome@gentoo.org lilwyrm@gmail.com mips@gentoo.org xoen.gnu@gmail.com allanonjl@gentoo.org 2006-01-02 15:51:37 0000 All these packages should be tested and stabled together. I am part of the x86 team, but would like another member to test to make sure. I've been running these packages on an otherwise stable box for about a month, with no outstanding issues. The specific problems with NVIDIA and RenderAccel have been "addressed" through a message displayed to the user in post install. Please see bug #113123 if you would like to see more information about the bug. Make comments about any GTK+ specific problems on the "Depends on bug" ( made specifically for GTK ). This is in preparation for eventually stabling gnome 2.12. Thanks! package: target keywords gtk+-2.8.8: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86 pango-1.10.2: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86 cairo-1.0.2: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, ppc macos, s390, sh, sparc, x86 glib-2.8.4: alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, ppc, ppc64, ppc macos, s390, sh, sparc, x86 atk-1.10.3: alpha,amd64,arm,hppa,ia64,mips,ppc,ppc64,s390,sparc,x86 grobian@gentoo.org 2006-01-03 01:29:53 0000 glib-2.8.4: ppc-macos stable cairo: not stabled as there exists no ppc-macos stable version gustavoz@gentoo.org 2006-01-03 05:42:45 0000 sparc stable. corsair@gentoo.org 2006-01-03 08:27:43 0000 stable on ppc64 metalgod@gentoo.org 2006-01-03 08:49:34 0000 amd64 done... i marked stable glitz-0.4.4 to satisfy cairo dependency ferdy@gentoo.org 2006-01-03 15:13:39 0000 I stabled pango, cairo and glib on alpha. However gtk+'s tests fail: --- >8 --- make[4]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/gtk+-2.8.8/work/gtk+-2.8.8/gdk-pixbuf' --- expected-abi 2006-01-03 23:02:49 +0000 +++ actual-abi 2006-01-03 23:02:49 +0000 @@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ gdk_pixbuf_loader_new_with_type gdk_pixbuf_loader_set_size gdk_pixbuf_loader_write -gdk_pixbuf_major_version -gdk_pixbuf_micro_version -gdk_pixbuf_minor_version gdk_pixbuf_new gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file @@ -87,7 +84,6 @@ gdk_pixbuf_simple_anim_iter_get_type gdk_pixbuf_simple_anim_new gdk_pixbuf_unref -gdk_pixbuf_version gdk_pixdata_deserialize gdk_pixdata_from_pixbuf gdk_pixdata_serialize FAIL: abicheck.sh --- >8 --- Is that expected to fail ? Cheers, Ferdy allanonjl@gentoo.org 2006-01-03 16:39:06 0000 just to add a note, spoke to ferdy and told him that it passes the tests for me ( on x86 ). halcy0n@gentoo.org 2006-01-04 15:26:50 0000 x86 done openhs@users.sourceforge.net 2006-01-05 11:24:55 0000 Please see bug #117916 which is related to this (oregano needs old cairo). joem@gentoo.org 2006-01-06 10:58:14 0000 *** Bug 112951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** dertobi123@gentoo.org 2006-01-08 04:43:53 0000 ppc stable ferdy@gentoo.org 2006-01-11 11:58:10 0000 With respect to comment #5: I tested some GTK+ applications (including gaim, evolution, gnumeric and abiword) and gtk-demo, and everything seems to work. However, I still get those errors on tests. I stabled everything you asked for but gtk+-2.8.8. I'm hereby requesting advise from the Gnome Herd. I'm GTK+ clueless. Cheers, Ferdy vapier@gentoo.org 2006-01-11 16:57:37 0000 gtk failing `make test` is something the GNOME team has ignored for a while ... see bugs 84078 and 83915 i'll go ahead and file a fresh one ferdy@gentoo.org 2006-01-13 15:04:50 0000 Stable on alpha now. Thanks SpanKY for filing that bug. Cheers, Ferdy gustavoz@gentoo.org 2006-03-13 13:44:37 0000 hppa done some time ago. geoman@gentoo.org 2006-04-14 18:31:53 0000 mips should be ahead on all of these now compnerd@gentoo.org 2006-09-04 00:46:15 0000 old and done, marking as fixed