117246 2005-12-30 18:24 0000 please stabilize dev-python/qscintilla-1.5.1 and related packages 2006-02-23 09:11:50 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P1 normal --- 83813 1 carlo@gentoo.org ppc@gentoo.org howard_b_golden@yahoo.com carlo@gentoo.org 2005-12-30 18:24:07 0000 O.k. this is a bit more complicated. This is not only the request to mark stable, but also a change in version numbering. So please mark >=qscintilla-1.54 testing ( the ebuilds will be removed later ) Also to be marked stable (as you're affected) dev-python/sip-4.2.1 dev-python/PyQt-3.14.1-r1 app-editors/cute-0.2.9-r2 dev-util/eric-3.7.2-r1 Thanks everyone. :) blubb@gentoo.org 2005-12-31 02:29:11 0000 Do you really want us to downgrade >=1.54 to testing? Most arches (all except ppc and x86) don't have anything <1.54 stable.. Or did you mean >1.54? blubb@gentoo.org 2005-12-31 02:43:45 0000 i just realized that i probably should read the title of a bug before asking dumb questions.. sorry for the bugspam :D blubb@gentoo.org 2005-12-31 04:17:42 0000 amd64 done chriswhite@gentoo.org 2006-01-01 23:27:44 0000 Before I go off and do this, let me make sure I understand correctly. The current setup is like so: qscintilla-1.5.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~ia64 ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc x86" qscintilla-1.54.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha ia64 amd64" qscintilla-1.6.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86" qscintilla-1.60.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha ~ia64 amd64" qscintilla-1.61.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ppc sparc alpha ia64 amd64 ppc64" qscintilla-1.65.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc ~sparc ~alpha ~ia64 ~amd64 ppc64" 1.5.1 is actually newer than 1.54, but because of the way portage handles version-ing, 1.54 will show up as newer. So you want us to mark 1.{54,6,60,61,65) as ~arch and 1.5.1 as stable so the versioning happens properly. Then once that's done 1.{54,60,61,65} will be removed leaving 1.5.1 as stable, and 1.6 as unstable. This all sound right? howard_b_golden@yahoo.com 2006-01-02 00:21:49 0000 Chris: Re comment #4: Your statement is correct, but this may be an easier way to understand the situation: Scintilla 1.54 was used in QScintilla 1.2 Scintilla 1.60 was used in QScintilla 1.3 Scintilla 1.61 was used in QScintilla 1.4 Scintilla 1.62 was used in QScintilla 1.5.1 Scintilla 1.65 was used in QScintilla 1.6 Therefore, the two latest versions of QScintilla are 1.5.1 and 1.6. QScintilla 1.5.1 is actually newer than Scintilla 1.54, 1.60 and 1.61. QScintilla 1.6 is the same vintage as Scintilla 1.65. When the dust settles, we'll be left with QScintilla 1.5.1 (stable) and QScintilla 1.6 (testing). carlo@gentoo.org 2006-01-02 02:22:17 0000 Yes and yes. carlo@gentoo.org 2006-01-04 10:41:00 0000 I have to add media-sound/albumart-1.5.0-r1 to the list. Please mark it stable a well. (: chriswhite@gentoo.org 2006-01-05 01:03:29 0000 x86 stable on all, couple of things onced I produced the described setup: PyQt-3.8.1 complained from repoman, had to drop x86 from that since PyQt-3.14.1-r1 was stable anyways. cute-0.2.9 complained from repoman, had to drop x86 from that since cute-0.2.9-r2 was stable anyways. eric-3.5.1 complained from repoman, had to drop x86 from that since eric-3.7.2-r1 was stable anyways. herbs@gentoo.org 2006-01-05 07:21:13 0000 albumart-1.5.0-r1 stable on amd64 gustavoz@gentoo.org 2006-01-05 12:44:16 0000 sparc is done, hope i didn't miss anything ;) nixnut@gentoo.org 2006-01-14 07:40:06 0000 qscintilla-1.5.1 was already stable on ppc albumart-1.5.0-r1 marked stable on ppc now yoswink@gentoo.org 2006-01-14 12:48:37 0000 With respect to alpha, we have: qscintilla-1.54 is stable (all other versions marked testing) dev-python/sip-4.2.1 and dev-python/PyQt-3.14.1-r1 are now stable too. No more packages were affected by the update in alpha. corsair@gentoo.org 2006-01-24 11:37:40 0000 ppc64 done carlo@gentoo.org 2006-01-31 15:40:55 0000 If you could spend some ia64 cycles, please!? I'd like to clean up the mess. :) alan@ajackson.org 2006-02-03 18:57:45 0000 Fixed on AMD64 agriffis@gentoo.org 2006-02-17 07:36:48 0000 alpha and ia64 are finally fixed up. Yoswink had fixed up qscintilla earlier for alpha, but then I came through and broke things because I misunderstood. Sorry about that! agriffis@gentoo.org 2006-02-17 14:14:25 0000 based on the cc list, I think this can be closed now howard_b_golden@yahoo.com 2006-02-17 15:18:11 0000 Re: Comment #17: Aron, looking at CVS, I think this isn't quite fixed: Versions of qscintilla > 1.6 are still marked stable on PPC. These must be marked unstable. Then, all qscintilla ebuilds > 1.6 must be removed. agriffis@gentoo.org 2006-02-22 15:11:42 0000 Thanks Howard, it looks like the ppc team was missed somewhere along the line carlo@gentoo.org 2006-02-23 09:11:50 0000 I cleaned up yesterday, so this is not an issue anymore.