116760 2005-12-26 01:15 0000 please stablize sys-block/gparted-0.0.9 2006-01-21 11:18:02 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 blubb@gentoo.org blubb@gentoo.org ppc@gentoo.org blubb@gentoo.org 2005-12-26 01:15:28 0000 *gparted-0.0.9 (26 Nov 2005) 26 Nov 2005; Simon Stelling <blubb@gentoo.org> +gparted-0.0.9.ebuild: version bump It's been in testing for 30 days now, no open bugs, so it is already stable on amd64. halcy0n@gentoo.org 2005-12-26 18:03:50 0000 x86 done hfsutils and gparted marked stable. josejx@gentoo.org 2006-01-07 23:10:36 0000 Should we wait until 0.0.9-r1 can be marked stable because of bug #116598 instead? Or do you still want 0.0.9 marked stable? blubb@gentoo.org 2006-01-08 02:39:14 0000 the only change from 0.0.9 to 0.0.9-r1 is - xfs? ( sys-fs/xfsprogs )" + xfs? ( sys-fs/xfsprogs sys-fs/xfsdump )" I don't really care which you stablize, but tbh I don't think it's really worth waiting another 14 days just because of an added dep. So you can either break the holy policy or stablize 0.0.9 ;) The only reason I asked to stablize -r0 was that I didn't want people shouting at me because I wanted an ebuild stable that was only a few days old. josejx@gentoo.org 2006-01-21 11:18:02 0000 Marked ppc stable and we're the last arch, so closing the bug.