<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>115982</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-12-18 14:15 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>media-sound/alsa-oss-1.0.10-r1 (early) stable request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-12-20 04:44:52 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>flameeyes@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>sound@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-18 14:15:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>As the summary says, I&apos;m asking for an early stable on media-sound/alsa-oss-1.0.10-r1. The -r0 version has a broken aoss script, LD_PRELOAD wasn&apos;t loaded correctly, making it fail to work.

Thanks,
Diego</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-18 14:22:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The stable version on x86 is 1.0.10_rc3, is this affected as well? Please remove us if not.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-18 14:31:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>If it wasn&apos;t, I wouldn&apos;t have asked you an early stable and just done on amd64 :)
The difference between rc3 and final was just the version number:

diff -ur alsa-oss-1.0.10rc3/configure alsa-oss-1.0.10/configure
--- alsa-oss-1.0.10rc3/configure        2005-11-04 11:42:01.000000000 +0100
+++ alsa-oss-1.0.10/configure   2005-11-16 16:20:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@

 # Define the identity of the package.
  PACKAGE=alsa-oss
- VERSION=1.0.10rc3
+ VERSION=1.0.10


 cat &gt;&gt;confdefs.h &lt;&lt;_ACEOF
diff -ur alsa-oss-1.0.10rc3/configure.in alsa-oss-1.0.10/configure.in
--- alsa-oss-1.0.10rc3/configure.in     2005-11-04 11:19:38.000000000 +0100
+++ alsa-oss-1.0.10/configure.in        2005-11-15 14:45:25.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 AC_PREREQ(2.53)
 AC_INIT(alsa/alsa-oss.c)
-AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(alsa-oss, 1.0.10rc3)
+AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(alsa-oss, 1.0.10)

 LIBTOOL_VERSION_INFO=&quot;0:0:0&quot;
 AC_SUBST(LIBTOOL_VERSION_INFO)
diff -ur alsa-oss-1.0.10rc3/Makefile.in alsa-oss-1.0.10/Makefile.in
--- alsa-oss-1.0.10rc3/Makefile.in      2005-11-04 11:41:56.000000000 +0100
+++ alsa-oss-1.0.10/Makefile.in 2005-11-16 16:20:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@
 sharedstatedir = @sharedstatedir@
 sysconfdir = @sysconfdir@
 target_alias = @target_alias@
-@WITH_AOSS_FALSE@ALSA_DIR =
 @WITH_AOSS_TRUE@ALSA_DIR = alsa
+@WITH_AOSS_FALSE@ALSA_DIR =

 SUBDIRS = $(ALSA_DIR) oss-redir test
 AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-18 15:07:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; If it wasn&apos;t, I wouldn&apos;t have asked you an early stable and just done on amd64
&gt; :)
&gt; The difference between rc3 and final was just the version number:
&gt; 

So this means that we don&apos;t have to mark all the other packages stable as well as is usually the case with alsa?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-18 15:23:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>rc3 is already stable for x86, and as there&apos;s no actual change, yeah there&apos;s no problem in mixing and matching 1.0.10-r1 with the current x86 stable version of alsa.
Really.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>metalgod@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-18 18:40:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>amd64 done</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-20 04:34:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 done for media-libs/alsa-oss</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-20 04:44:52 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Closing.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>