114188 2005-12-01 13:37 0000 vserver-sources missing bme patch 2006-04-21 00:04:20 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Core system unspecified x86 Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 enhancement --- 1 c.affolter@stepping-stone.ch vserver-devs@gentoo.org c.affolter@stepping-stone.ch 2005-12-01 13:37:32 0000 It would be really nice if Herbert's bme (Bind Mount Extensions) patch could be included in the vserver-sources. The patch provides read only bind mounts. Otherwise the suggested handy /usr/portage ro bind mount within a vserver will be writable. I've successfully applied the latest bme patch (http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/delta-2.6.14.2-vs2.0.1-rc2-bme0.06.1.diff) against vserver-sources 2.0.1_rc3-r2 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. phreak@gentoo.org 2005-12-02 02:46:18 0000 Thanks for the headsup Christian, commited an -r3 just a second ago. c.affolter@stepping-stone.ch 2006-04-19 15:34:18 0000 I'm sorry for disturbing you again with this issue... But within vserver-sources-2.1.0-r[1|2] (2.6.15) the bme patch seems to be disappeared. As far as I can see, the patch was included for the last time inside the [1] patch set. unfortunately according to this thread [2] there isn't any bme diff against 2.6.15 around :( I've tried to apply both, the 2.6.14 [3] and 2.6.16 [4] diff against the vserver-sources-2.1.0-r2 (2.6.15), with no luck. Would it be possible to re-include the patch in the next release (>=2.6.16), or even forward/back port one of the available patches? Many thanks! [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~phreak/distfiles/vserver-patches-2.6.14_2.0.1_rc5-r1.tar.bz2 [2] http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg12329.html [3] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/BME/delta-2.6.14.2-vs2.0.1-rc2-bme0.06.1.diff [4] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.16-rc1-bme0.06.2.diff c.affolter@stepping-stone.ch 2006-04-19 15:51:24 0000 Uhmm, I was talking about sys-kernel/vserver-sources-2.0.1-r2 not sys-kernel/vserver-sources-2.1.0-r2. Sorry for that! hollow@gentoo.org 2006-04-21 00:04:20 0000 beside that bme was not in 2.0.1 (but in 2.0-r1) i have added 2.0.1-r3 to the tree with bme included.. it seems we forgot to carry bme arround in 2.0.1 since it is included in 2.0.2 and 2.1* already.. anyway, in cvs, fixed, thanks.