<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>113966</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-11-29 17:58 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Stable request for app-text/an-0.95.3</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-03-09 03:28:36 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://packages.debian.org/stable/games/an</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>113994</dependson>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>jer@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>jer@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-29 17:58:05 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I have imported Debian&apos;s improved version[1] of venerable anagram generator `an
&apos;. I have also imported the original 0.93, which Debian&apos;s maintainers think has 
some faults. As far as I can tell, both versions still need some work.

I would like to find out what architectures support this and what arch herds 
would like to support it. It&apos;s only a very small app with hardly any 
dependencies (a C compiler and sys-apps/miscfiles), so I haven&apos;t excluded any 
architectures.

Please keyword (or not), add a comment here as to what works or doesn&apos;t work, 
and remove yourselves from the CC list when done. Clues are welcome, 
particularly to cure the sys-apps/miscfiles + USE=minimal problem the ebuild 
warns against.

I&apos;m looking forward to your input. :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-29 20:23:59 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>We don&apos;t tend to keyword on sparc or mips unless there&apos;s user demand for a
program or if it&apos;s needed as a dependency.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>grobian@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-30 13:29:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Since it doesn&apos;t compile for ppc-macos, we&apos;d like to defer keywording this
ebuild to the point a user files a bug against it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tgall@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-30 20:24:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>builds and appears to work on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-30 21:40:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Both versions seem to work on x86.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>metalgod@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-01 12:37:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>both keyworded on amd64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>nixnut@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-02 02:25:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>both version build and work on ppc</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>wormo@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-10 23:07:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>marking app-text/an-0.95.3 ~ppc.

The 0.93 ebuild also needs to inherit eutils since it uses &quot;built_with_use&quot;. Is
there a reason to keep that older version around?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dertobi123@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-14 01:10:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>0.95.3 already marked ~ppc, 0.93 disappeared ... so i guess ppc is done, removing us from CC</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>yoswink@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-15 04:54:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>marked ~alpha</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-16 17:04:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hppa was done a while ago.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-23 13:25:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>time for marking stable? this is ~ppc64 since 30 Nov 2005.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-24 10:02:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #11)
&gt; time for marking stable? this is ~ppc64 since 30 Nov 2005.

Let&apos;s do that. :)

I&apos;m removing all arches that haven&apos;t responded so far, and adding the ones currently marked for testing.

Please target: app-text/an-0.95.3 alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 x86</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-24 10:04:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hppa stable.

Arches, please target: app-text/an-0.95.3 alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 x86

(And my apologies for the bug spam.)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-24 10:21:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on ppc64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>deltacow@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-24 11:00:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>okay to go stable on amd64.  (not putting the STABLE keyword because other archs are to weigh in on this.)

tesla ~ # emerge --info
Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 x86_64 AMD Turion(tm) 64 Mobile Technology ML-32
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=&quot;amd64&quot;
AUTOCLEAN=&quot;yes&quot;
CBUILD=&quot;x86_64-pc-linux-gnu&quot;
CFLAGS=&quot;-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe&quot;
CHOST=&quot;x86_64-pc-linux-gnu&quot;
CONFIG_PROTECT=&quot;/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib64/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control&quot;
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=&quot;/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d&quot;
CXXFLAGS=&quot;-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe&quot;
DISTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/distfiles&quot;
FEATURES=&quot;autoconfig distlocks multilib-strict sandbox sfperms strict&quot;
GENTOO_MIRRORS=&quot;http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo&quot;
MAKEOPTS=&quot;-j2&quot;
PKGDIR=&quot;/usr/portage/packages&quot;
PORTAGE_TMPDIR=&quot;/var/tmp&quot;
PORTDIR=&quot;/usr/portage&quot;
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=&quot;/usr/local/portage&quot;
SYNC=&quot;rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage&quot;
USE=&quot;amd64 X acpi alsa audiofile avi berkdb bitmap-fonts browserplugin bzip2 cdr crypt cups dbus divx4linux dvd dvdr dvdread eds emboss encode esd exif expat fam firefox foomaticdb fortran gif glut gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml hal icq idn imap imlib ipv6 jabber java jpeg lcms live lzw lzw-tiff mad mjpeg mng mozilla mp3 mpeg msn native ncurses network nls no-old-linux nptl nptlonly nsplugin offensive ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pcre pdflib perl png python quicktime radeon read readline rtc sdk sdl spell ssl svg tcpd theora tiff transcode truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev usb userlocales v4l v4l2 visualization vorbis wmf xine xml2 xpm xv xvid xvmc yahoo zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc&quot;
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>port001@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-24 11:03:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on x86.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>chutzpah@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-24 11:21:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on amd64, thanks for testing.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-31 07:01:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marked ppc stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>yoswink@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-01 06:05:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha marked an as testing 15 days ago. I&apos;ll wait for another 15 days before mark it stable if no good reason against this appears. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-07 02:54:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>alpha: ping</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>yoswink@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-09 03:28:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>pong! and all is done. 

Marked the bug as fixed :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>