<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>112977</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-11-19 02:29 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Please mark smarty 2.6.10 stable (both x86 and amd64)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-11-22 11:24:04 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Library</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>martinov@developer.bg</reporter>
          <assigned_to>tomk@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>amd64-test@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>php-bugs@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>martinov@developer.bg</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-19 02:29:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I&apos;m using smarty 2.6.10 ~x86 and ~amd64 and both are working fine for a quite
long time. Should I file another bug report for ~amd64?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-19 07:51:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>tomk: Is this version ready for stable in your opinion?
Martin: No need to file another bug</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>tomk@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-21 11:38:21 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; tomk: Is this version ready for stable in your opinion?

Yes it&apos;s ready, I&apos;ve been using it for a while now with no problems, just hadn&apos;t
got round to marking it stable. Could someone from the x86 team mark it stable?
I&apos;ve also lost my amd64 dev box so can&apos;t do any more amd64 testing.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-21 16:50:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on x86, thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-22 11:24:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>stable on amd64, so we&apos;re done</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>