112842 2005-11-17 08:38 0000 KDE 3.4.3: stable request 2006-07-03 05:41:53 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux KDE unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 greg_g@gentoo.org kde@gentoo.org avuton@gmail.com bart.braem@gmail.com csights@fastmail.fm esigra@gmail.com mips@gentoo.org greg_g@gentoo.org 2005-11-17 08:38:38 0000 I think KDE 3.4.3 is ready to go stable now. I don't think there are open problems at the moment that can hold it back, can you think of any? If not, we can start adding arches to CC. caleb@gentoo.org 2005-11-17 09:44:43 0000 it's been running quite well here on a few machines (x86) cryos@gentoo.org 2005-11-18 03:16:31 0000 I would agree with you - it is ready for stable on amd64 AFAIK. Running great here on a few systems. greg_g@gentoo.org 2005-11-19 10:40:09 0000 Adding arches to CC to mark KDE 3.4.3 stable. Notes: the release includes - kde-base/kde and its dependencies - kde-base/kde-meta and its dependencies - kde-base/kdesdk, kde-base/kdesdk-meta and deps - kde-base/kdebindings-meta and deps - kde-base/kde-i18n if possible, they should be marked stable at the same time. kdeedu-3.4.3-r10 and kig-3.4.3-r10 have a dep on dev-libs/boost, if it's not available you can mark stable kdeedu-3.4.3 and kig-3.4.3 instead not all split ebuilds were bumped to 3.4.3, clearly if there isn't an ebuild for 3.4.3, 3.4.2 should be marked stable. Thanks! betelgeuse@gentoo.org 2005-11-19 17:09:28 0000 As a note to arches: The Finnish translation in the current stable version is broken, see bug #94836 for details. The sooner we get this stable, the sooner Finnish users are happy. bart.braem@gmail.com 2005-11-24 01:44:02 0000 I agree here, there seem to be some problems with the IMAP filters support which are resolved in 3.4.3. gustavoz@gentoo.org 2005-11-24 10:28:29 0000 sparc done, i think ;) toto@darkside.tomsk.ru 2005-11-24 13:15:26 0000 I used 3.4.3 over month on x86, and is stable work cryos@gentoo.org 2005-11-25 07:03:27 0000 amd64 marked all stable now... corsair@gentoo.org 2005-11-25 12:50:27 0000 kde-base/kde-meta, kde-base/kdesdk-meta, kde-base/kde-i18n are stable on ppc64 now. but what is kde-base/kdebindings-meta good for? This one was never marked ~ppc64. I'll add it to the ebuilds when I've tested them, but that's is my problem: What are those ebuilds good for and how to test them? greg_g@gentoo.org 2005-11-25 14:31:14 0000 It's ok to avoid kde-base/kdebindings-meta if it didn't have the ~arch keyword in the first place (personally I cannot say how much testing is reasonable for them, programming something in each of those languages goes beyond good sense...). But you may want to mark kde-base/kjsembed (javascript bindings), it is ~ppc64 as it is used as dependency of something else. chriswhite@gentoo.org 2005-11-25 16:49:43 0000 kde-base/kdeaccessibility-meta has issues with ksayit (bug #91004, I'm still trying the revdep-rebuild solution to see iff it works). ksttd won't speak text at all, I compiled everything with arts support, arts works, festival is installed, still no go. khotkeys crashes on startup. It appears to be linked to: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108712 This leaves kdeaccessibility fully tested otherwise, and kdebase about 75% tested. chriswhite@gentoo.org 2005-11-25 17:15:43 0000 nope, bug #91004 is still a showstopper. It appears to be fixed in 3.5, but the changes involve somewhat unique code changes, nothing I think that's backportable. They use something else instead of macros to get around the whole invalid pointer deal. Mask it maybe? kmouth seems like a better alternative and it works for me. corsair@gentoo.org 2005-11-26 00:08:58 0000 mhh... kjsembed is stable on ppc64 now. betelgeuse@gentoo.org 2005-11-26 02:53:45 0000 (In reply to comment #11) > kde-base/kdeaccessibility-meta has issues with ksayit (bug #91004, I'm still > trying the revdep-rebuild solution to see iff it works). ksttd won't speak text > at all, I compiled everything with arts support, arts works, festival is > installed, still no go. khotkeys crashes on startup. It appears to be linked > to: > So are these new problems that have been introduced since 3.4.1? I am not seeing anything in that bug preventing going stable. The comments so far indicate the problem would be in gcc/glibc. Please comment on the bug if have more accurate information. greg_g@gentoo.org 2005-11-26 05:56:47 0000 ksayit-3.4.3 works fine here, bug #91004 definitely looks like a local problem, anyone can confirm? bart.braem@gmail.com 2005-11-29 00:51:59 0000 Bug #91004 seems to be fixed? chriswhite@gentoo.org 2005-11-30 03:08:41 0000 Ok, pretty much all of my previous issues are resolved, except for kimagemapeditor, which has some interesting bugs: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93351 which also has a patch and http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 which I'm still waiting on. This I need to mark the webdev stuff. Also, kcron needs to depend on virtual/cron for crontab, otherwise it plain doesn't meet its purpose. I need this to mark kdeadmin. I'm going to have a talk with compnerd because the java tests that come with kdebindings aren't quite working because of class import errors. I don't use java so I have no clue how to handle it :P. Everything else is ok, and there were a couple of packages that I simple couldn't test because either a) I had no clue how to or b) I didn't have the hardware/setup to test it. For b) I simply made sure the package at least ran and the properties seemed somewhat sane. greg_g@gentoo.org 2005-12-01 05:16:27 0000 Added dependency on virtual/cron. For some problems, like the kimagemapeditor ones, I guess we just have to live with them (consider that KDE has more than 10.000 open bugs, and a few applications are definitely not in good shape, kimagemapeditor is one of them). Thanks a lot for taking the burden on yourself to test all of KDE, it is really appreciated! cryos@gentoo.org 2005-12-02 07:49:21 0000 There was an issue with ksayit and our glibc, thanks to a patch supplied by Chris White that is now resolved. Could all archs please make sure they stabilise the versions below with the patch included. ksayit-3.4.3-r1 kdeaccessibility-3.4.3-r1 Adding archs that have already stabled back in to stabilise these two packages. weeve@gentoo.org 2005-12-02 09:12:58 0000 Do you know what versions of glibc are affected? SPARC is quite behind the curve here, using sys-libs/glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r2. corsair@gentoo.org 2005-12-04 03:07:49 0000 ksayit-3.4.3-r1 stable on ppc64 johnherdy@msn.com 2005-12-06 05:00:58 0000 hi guys from x86-team, sorry to ask this question, but are there any plans to mark 3.4.3 stable soon? I'm asking this because I want to upgrade gcc on my system with revdep-rebuild -X --library libstdc++.so.5 -- -v It would be nice if 3.4.3 is build with the same action or else I need to wait a long time for a compile twice in a short period. If nothing is planned or it's already known that stabilization will take a fair amount of time, please let us know so we don't have to wait with the gcc-upgrade. Thanks! bart.braem@gmail.com 2005-12-08 07:23:51 0000 I have the same question: is there any estimation for x86? Thanks wolf31o2@gentoo.org 2005-12-08 07:51:31 0000 Some time between now and March of 2006... remember that "KDE" is now a huge collection of packages to test. It isn't something that can even be done overnight. Asking when it will be done over and over again isn't productive for anyone. josejx@gentoo.org 2005-12-09 02:24:07 0000 ppc should be complete now, please re-add us if I missed something. chriswhite@gentoo.org 2005-12-10 02:39:25 0000 x86 is now done save kdebindings, which have issues with the java bindings, and I think Diego mentioned something about ruby bindings being odd too. flameeyes@gentoo.org 2005-12-10 04:51:31 0000 Ruby bindings are now fixed, Caleb patched them :) They still miss one function, but that would remain till 3.5.1 anyway. kloeri@gentoo.org 2005-12-10 15:52:44 0000 Stable on alpha. greg_g@gentoo.org 2005-12-11 02:49:24 0000 Chris, can you mark kdeutils-3.4.3-r1/klaptopdaemon-3.4.3-r1 stable on x86 to stay in line with other arches? Thanks! jan@schnackenberg.org 2005-12-12 00:17:53 0000 On x86 kjsembed-3.4.3 is still marked ~x86 which causes an upgrade/downgrade circle if koffice is installed. (kjsembed-3.4.1 depends on =kwin-3.4.1) kjsembed installed fine after putting =kde-base/kjsembed-3.4.3 ~x86 into /etc/portage/package.keywords. But without you either cannot install koffice (cleanly) or you get above mentioned problem. danyer@gmail.com 2005-12-13 22:50:56 0000 Chris, can you mark kde-base/kdebindings-meta-3.4.3 stable on x86? It seems to me that its dependencies are all stable now. Thanks! gustavoz@gentoo.org 2005-12-14 05:52:19 0000 sparc done. chriswhite@gentoo.org 2005-12-14 09:18:37 0000 Hmm.. I did about 2 days ago. betelgeuse@gentoo.org 2005-12-14 09:27:10 0000 http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=kdebindings gustavoz@gentoo.org 2006-03-13 13:49:38 0000 This was done some time ago. caleb@gentoo.org 2006-07-03 05:41:53 0000 closing, as 3.5.2 is now already stable as well.