<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>110317</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-10-24 06:05 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Please add ebuild for new unionfs-1.1.1</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-02-13 05:44:10 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>radek@podgorny.cz</reporter>
          <assigned_to>satya@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>genstef@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>kyron@neuralbs.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>radek@podgorny.cz</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-24 06:05:00 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The new release is linux-2.6 only and includes many important bugfixes...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-24 07:49:23 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Can you please post the unified diff (diff -u old.ebuild new.ebuild)?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-27 00:40:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>1.1.1 resolves most large directories issues, save nfs locking (patch will follow)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-27 01:27:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=71549)
nfs lock patch
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-27 01:30:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=71550)
unionfs 1.1.1 ebuild (patch vs 1.0.14)
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-27 01:31:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I couldn&apos;t test it on amd64. Anyone?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>drclute@computervisions.net</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-06 03:37:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I can confirm that this patch works on AMD64 systems.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>drclute@computervisions.net</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-06 22:19:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; I can confirm that this patch works on AMD64 systems.

Meant to state that the ebuild resulting from the patch works on AMD64 systems.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-24 16:30:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I do not use unionfs currently. Satya, can you please bump it or should it be moved to maintainer-needed?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-25 02:16:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ok, I&apos;m taking it.
I haven&apos;t access to my dev box at now: travelling until the 3rd week of january, but maybe I&apos;ll be able to do something before (you&apos;ll still have to wait the beginning of january, though).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>kyron@neuralbs.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-27 15:27:09 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well...jsut thought I&apos;d say I simply renamed unionfs-1.0.14.ebuild to unionfs-1.1.2.ebuild, removed the epatch entries and everything built perfectly well. The module seems to be working fine for the moment as I am using it for a Gentoo SSI configuration http://wiki.neuralbs.com/index.php/Gentoo_Diskless_Client without any problems (arch is x86).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>satya@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-13 05:44:10 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>in portage: sorry for the delay.
Thanks to all testers!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>71549</attachid>
            <date>2005-10-27 01:27 0000</date>
            <desc>nfs lock patch</desc>
            <filename>unionfs-1.1.1-10-nfs.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIGlub2RlLmMub3JpZwkyMDA1LTEwLTI3IDEwOjAxOjQ4LjAwMDAwMDAwMCArMDIwMAorKysg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</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>71550</attachid>
            <date>2005-10-27 01:30 0000</date>
            <desc>unionfs 1.1.1 ebuild (patch vs 1.0.14)</desc>
            <filename>unionfs-1.1.1.ebuild.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">LS0tIC91c3IvcG9ydGFnZS9zeXMtZnMvdW5pb25mcy91bmlvbmZzLTEuMC4xNC5lYnVpbGQJMjAw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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>