<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>109721</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-10-18 10:10 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-office/kmymoney2-0.8 stable request</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-11-19 17:20:46 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>greg_g@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>kde@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>greg_g@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-18 10:10:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>app-office/kmymoney2-0.8 is candidate for going stable, please give it a try. 
 
P.S.: Is it ok for you to have stable request in this form? If you have some 
comment on preferred practices let us know. If it&apos;s ok, I will start posting 
many other bugs (~15-20) identical to this one.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-18 10:16:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>&gt; P.S.: Is it ok for you to have stable request in this form? If you have some 
&gt; comment on preferred practices let us know. If it&apos;s ok, I will start posting 
&gt; many other bugs (~15-20) identical to this one.

Fine by me, just please assign the bugs to yourself or the KDE team.  We&apos;ll just
be doing that anyway once we finish the bug for x86 :)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cryos@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-18 11:20:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I was just about to ask if anyone had any objections to this being stabilised - 
I use it to manage all my meager finances ;) Stable on amd64. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weeve@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-21 17:46:20 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stable on SPARC.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-23 18:48:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>x86 done</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-19 17:20:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hansmi has already marked this stable, closing the bug since we&apos;re the last arch.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>