108065 2005-10-04 06:05 0000 stabilize app-i18n/nabi-0.15 (was: (Korean XIM) doesn't install its data files in correct directory) 2008-03-27 16:58:58 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED KEYWORDREQ, STABLEREQ P2 normal --- 1 tanarrian@yahoo.co.kr cjk@gentoo.org jakub@gentoo.org luna.jetch@gmail.com tanarrian@yahoo.co.kr 2005-10-04 06:05:12 0000 nabi-0.14.ebuild installs its shared data under /usr/share/nabi/. However its executable tries to find its data from /usr/local/share/nabi/ Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge nabi 2. launch nabi from gnome-terminal. 3. try to select any menu item from its window. 4. see the log message from the gnome-terminal. Actual Results: It does not work properly. After changing the input mode to the Korean (shift- space), it does not generate the proper korean glyphs. Expected Results: In the korean input mode (shift-space), it should generate the proper korean glyphs. To solve this problem temporarily, create a symlink to /usr/share/nabi from /usr/local/share/nabi. # cd /usr/local/share # ln -s /usr/share/nabi nabi I think may be the nabi 0.14 hard coded the installed directory in its source. tanarrian@yahoo.co.kr 2005-10-04 06:14:14 0000 Portage 2.0.51.22-r2 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.3.6, glibc-2.3.5-r1, 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 i686) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13 ccache version 2.3 [enabled] dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.15.92.0.2-r10 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.18-r1 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share /config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/shar e/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/sh are/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/tex mf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://ftp.gentoo.or.kr http://mirror.gentoo.gr.jp http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="x86 X acpi alsa arts avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr cjk crypt cscope cups eds emacs emboss encode esd fam firefox font-server foomaticdb fortran gd gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml imagemagick imlib jpeg libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx motif mp3 mpeg mysql ncurses nls nptl ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pdflib perl png python qt quicktime readline samba sdl spell sse sse2 ssl tcpd tetex tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode vorbis xml2 xmms xv zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY usata@gentoo.org 2005-10-28 20:01:27 0000 Does nabi-0.15 has the problem, too? If not, I'd rather drop 0.14 and mark 0.15 stable than fix 0.14. luna.jetch@gmail.com 2007-01-13 02:16:30 0000 0.15 already working correctly over a year, upstream version was bumped. (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160385) IMHO, Close this bug and mark stable 0.15 version. jakub@gentoo.org 2008-03-22 13:19:30 0000 (In reply to comment #3) > 0.15 already working correctly over a year, > upstream version was bumped. > (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160385) > > IMHO, Close this bug and mark stable 0.15 version. arches, please test and stabilize app-i18n/nabi-0.17, it can't be worse than this. ppc, no idea why did your keyword vanish in 0.17, you might want to re-add yourself there and stabilize 0.15 meanwhile. Thanks. jakub@gentoo.org 2008-03-22 14:10:41 0000 Looking @ bug 165867, we'd better stick w/ 0.15 fauli@gentoo.org 2008-03-22 19:28:25 0000 x86 stable nixnut@gentoo.org 2008-03-27 16:58:58 0000 ppc stable. closing since we're last.