<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>105768</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-12 23:46 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>x11-proto/x11proto: update needed for Gentoo/FreeBSD (or workaround)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-04-12 10:50:20 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo/Alt</product>
          <component>Other</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>FreeBSD</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4487</bug_file_loc>
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>flameeyes@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>x11@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>bsd@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-12 23:46:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Basically as per FDO&apos;s bug #4078  
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4078), there was a missing  
define (-DCSRG_BASED) the workaround can just be adding a -DCSRG_BASED in  
xorg-server ebuild if use elibc_FreeBSD .  
  
Also, it seems __BSD_VISIBLE=1 is still missing, and this breaks build anyway. 
 
It&apos;s a starting point, tho. 
 
Thanks, 
Diego</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joshuabaergen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-14 19:29:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>So if I bump x11proto it still won&apos;t build?  Is there an upstream bug for the
__BSD_VISIBLE problem?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-15 02:36:49 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>that (__BSD_VISIBLE) is already fixed in current xorg-server CVS (_*_SOURCE 
defined in configure.ac for everything and not just glibc). </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joshuabaergen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-16 09:15:19 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Alright, if I have time I&apos;ll bump proto and server tonight.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joshuabaergen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-17 10:30:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I bumped proto but server seemed to be missing stuff as indicated in the
upstream bug.  If you want to try my fix I have a patch on my space:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~joshuabaergen/distfiles/...

Just update the current ebuild to use the CVS update from today&apos;s date
(20050917) from my URL.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joshuabaergen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-20 21:33:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>This is fixed in the latest versions.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joshuabaergen@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-20 21:33:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marking fixed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>flameeyes@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-21 11:02:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Closing now. 
 </thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>