<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>105738</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-09-12 15:25 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>net-wireless/acx100-0.2.4 - MD5 Digest Error</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-02-20 04:06:50 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>109844</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>archangel7@myrealbox.com</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mobile@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>dpblnt@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>gentoo-bugs@digital-trauma.de</cc>
    
    <cc>joerg@we-can-do.de</cc>
    
    <cc>kibs@vlh.dk</cc>
    
    <cc>markg@wler.co.uk</cc>
    
    <cc>mozilla@agotnes.com</cc>
    
    <cc>naerey@gmail.com</cc>
    
    <cc>podge@podgeweb.com</cc>
    
    <cc>yesiko0nz@gmail.com</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>archangel7@myrealbox.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-12 15:25:32 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>When trying to build acx100, it downloads the firmware from the projects site it
looks like.  &quot;fw.tar.bz2&quot; from &quot;acx100.erley.org&quot; and am getting a file digest
error.  Revision = net-wireless/acx100-0.2.4, probably changed it on the offical
project page and didn&apos;t update the digest in portage yet???  Could you please
fix this, thanx!

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pat@erley.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-21 15:09:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Whenever a new firmware is found, it&apos;s added and fw.tar.bz2 is recreated.  I&apos;m
going to create a copy on the server called fw-gentoo-0.2.4.tar.bz2 .  Whenever
a new release is done, just let me know what version you&apos;re going to and I&apos;ll
bump whatever the latest firmware tarball is to that version.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>archangel7@myrealbox.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-26 21:55:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Ya, I guess it&apos;s not really a bug, but didn&apos;t know how else to inform anyone. 
Thank you for the reply.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-28 06:11:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 107500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-28 06:14:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Seems to be changed again (22-Sep-2005).</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-28 06:17:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>How about informing upstream that this is bad practice - that they ought to 
use version numbers for their firmware tarballs?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>cardoe@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-28 10:44:18 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Getting on that right now in fact. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dpblnt@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-29 01:26:58 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>so what sould we change in the ebuild every time, if this Digest verification
Failed appears?
is there a workaround except waiting until the corrected ebuild enters portage?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dpblnt@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-29 01:33:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>oh, sorry i found it.
MD5 f39fe0132b99f075ade71705cafc8b15 fw.tar.bz2 422107 &gt;
/usr/portage/net-wireless/acx100/files/digest-acx100-0.2.4
MD5 0231018d80ae21435b5ee584748690cc files/digest-acx100-0.2.4 120 &gt;
/usr/portage/net-wireless/acx100/Manifest</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>pat@erley.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-17 00:16:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; How about informing upstream that this is bad practice - that they ought to 
&gt; use version numbers for their firmware tarballs?

Well, as the mirror that was, at least originally, being used was never notified
about the use (Bad practice), they couldn&apos;t have known that there was any need
to institute proper practice.  To be technical, we&apos;re going to pull those
firmware tarballs from that mirror because the current redistribution use is in
violation of our (MY) license with TI (as a card owner).  The mirror that the
firmwares are being pulled from is run by me, btw.  (I went a little over on my
bandwidth this much, 6MB over to be exact)

</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>egore@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-22 13:26:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Looks like the site currently denies to download the firmware. Is there another
mirror available? If one sends the most recent one to me I can mirror it at my
site. I got lots of bandwith per month (250GB or so, no idea, never hit that limit).

Pat Erley: Feel free to contact me to host that file.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-27 12:40:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Stefan, would you please take care of this issue? It is currently impossible to
merge net-wireless/acx100-2.4 due to a missing download...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-03 13:57:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 111403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gentoo-bugs@digital-trauma.de</who>
            <bug_when>2005-11-21 08:59:25 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=73314)
acx100-0.3.18 with working server

Hi,

the ACX100 development is a bit chaotic, and gentoo is actually using an
&quot;ancient&quot; version. I fixed it for myself but wasn&apos;t aware the driver is in such
a wide use in gentoo land. So here is a new ebuild (works with 2.6.14, too).

See http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=2892823 for success reports.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-25 08:33:38 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>fixed with 0.3.20</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-31 00:18:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 120987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-31 00:20:24 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Broken again... Like, can&apos;t we mirror the file ourselves if upstream is unable to use proper versioning? :(</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>calculuspenguin@yahoo.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-01 01:03:40 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I believe Bug 120478 is a duplicate of this one (or at least addresses the same issue).

Thanks</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-04 15:30:35 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I redigested it, thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joerg@we-can-do.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-14 08:55:53 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The download is broken again. You can host the file on my domain. I&apos;ve ne bandwitch limit or some thing like that.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-16 07:51:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>*** Bug 123044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-16 07:54:17 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Urgh, broken yet again. :-(</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>joerg@we-can-do.de</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-16 08:07:48 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>use ebuild  version 0.3.31 . This version works for me.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-18 07:07:26 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>thanks to CyberTerrorist we got a stable mirror.

I created a separate acx-firmware ebuild and renamed acx100 to acx.
acx is now on version 0.3.35.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>yesiko0nz@gmail.com</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-20 03:29:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>hi!

what&apos;s the acx-firmware ebuild?
some new acx-firmware ?
should i test it?

thanks in advance.
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-02-20 04:06:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>it is just the firmware split out, no functional changes. You should already use it when you have emerged acx ~arch.
Please leave this bug be, it is RESOLVED, FIXED. Support can take place somewhere else: IRC, email, jabber: nick@im.gentoo.org, mailing lists, ..</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>73314</attachid>
            <date>2005-11-21 08:59 0000</date>
            <desc>acx100-0.3.18 with working server</desc>
            <filename>acx100-0.3.18.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA1IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>