103112 2005-08-20 02:08 0000 log4j-1.2.11 depends on openjms even if USE-flag jms is not set 2005-08-20 10:15:03 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Applications unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 dev-zero@gentoo.org java@gentoo.org betelgeuse@gentoo.org mkrainer@gmail.com dev-zero@gentoo.org 2005-08-20 02:08:43 0000 I assume that there is a little typo in the RDEPEND line: jms? || ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* )" which should actually be: jms? ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* )" With the original version, the line use jms && antflags="${antflags} -Djms.jar=/opt/openjms/lib/jms-1.0.2a.jar" in src_compile() doesn't really make sense, does it? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: mkrainer@gmail.com 2005-08-20 02:46:22 0000 I think the correct RDEPEND for 'jms' should actually be: jms? ( || ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* ) )" (Added betelgeuse@gentoo.org to CC as he's in cvs $Header:$; hope that's ok) betelgeuse@gentoo.org 2005-08-20 04:34:40 0000 Well I get the java@gentoo.org email so it is useless to add me to CC. I should have been more thorough when doing the version bump. Sorry about that. Actually it is the use jms && antflags="${antflags} -Djms.jar=/opt/openjms/lib/jms-1.0.2a.jar" that should be fixed. jms? ( =dev-java/openjms-0.7.6* =dev-java/openjms-bin-0.7.6* )" This means that both openjms and openjms-bin are needed, which is not the case. betelgeuse@gentoo.org 2005-08-20 05:01:17 0000 I reverted to the old behaviour because depending on openjms would bring a circular dependency. dev-zero@gentoo.org 2005-08-20 10:15:03 0000 And depending on dev-java/openjms, which depends on dev-java/jms, where the user has to register at Sun is also not such a good idea, for just having the log4j emerged...