102183 2005-08-11 18:47 0000 mutt-1.5.10 (version bump) 2005-08-17 13:05:20 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Linux RESOLVED FIXED P2 enhancement --- 1 ufs@sapo.pt agriffis@gentoo.org ehmsen@gentoo.org ferdy@gentoo.org net-mail@gentoo.org ufs@sapo.pt 2005-08-11 18:47:35 0000 mutt-1.5.10 (version bump) Let's see if this one get's out before mutt-1.5.11 comes out! ;) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. ferdy@gentoo.org 2005-08-12 02:25:46 0000 Also note this is a rather major release since some patches (i.e. edit-threads) have been integrated into mutt. Aaron If you need help with this I'll be eager to help. Cheers, Ferdy ehmsen@gentoo.org 2005-08-16 14:07:19 0000 I also read at the header cache homepage (http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/mutt/) that it should be integrated into mutt from 1.5.10. It says so on the front page. ferdy@gentoo.org 2005-08-17 04:26:48 0000 Yes... I also noticed that the header cache has been fully merged. We think that is pointless to still maintaining nntp support in mutt since not a lot of people use it and muttng implements it. Also it difficults maintaining mutt up to date and adding new patches so mutt-1.5.10 won't have nntp support. I've been playing with mutt-1.5.10, I have a working (at least for me) ebuild in my overlay: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy/overlay/mail-client/mutt/mutt-1.5.10-r1.ebuild Though I'm having a little problem... switching from USE="vanilla" to USE="-vanilla" makes mutt segfault while evaluating the cache. I still don't know what's causing it. (I haven't tested if this happens with earlier mutt versions yet). If you could test that ebuild and report some feedback it'd be great. Cheers, Ferdy ufs@sapo.pt 2005-08-17 09:30:57 0000 (In reply to comment #3) > Yes... I also noticed that the header cache has been fully merged. > > We think that is pointless to still maintaining nntp support in mutt since not a > lot of people use it and muttng implements it. Also it difficults maintaining > mutt up to date and adding new patches so mutt-1.5.10 won't have nntp support. > > I've been playing with mutt-1.5.10, I have a working (at least for me) ebuild in > my overlay: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy/overlay/mail-client/mutt/mutt-1.5.10-r1.ebuild > > Though I'm having a little problem... switching from USE="vanilla" to > USE="-vanilla" makes mutt segfault while evaluating the cache. I still don't > know what's causing it. (I haven't tested if this happens with earlier mutt > versions yet). > > If you could test that ebuild and report some feedback it'd be great. > > Cheers, > Ferdy Try to delete the contents of your hader_cache directory to see if it stops segfaulting... It stopped with me with 1.5.9... ferdy@gentoo.org 2005-08-17 10:42:11 0000 Well... removing the header_cache directory works... I meant *switching* made it segfault (and also run out of memory, i.e. weird situation). From 'scratch' both (vanilla and -vanilla) work fine. Cheers, Ferdy hansmi@gentoo.org 2005-08-17 10:46:47 0000 I do use NNTP support in mutt and do not want to switch to another program for NNTP alone. Therefore, it would be glad if you could continue including it. ferdy@gentoo.org 2005-08-17 10:59:40 0000 Just heard from Aaron that we will continue to support nntp. Cheers, Ferdy ufs@sapo.pt 2005-08-17 11:17:58 0000 (In reply to comment #5) > Well... removing the header_cache directory works... I meant *switching* made it > segfault (and also run out of memory, i.e. weird situation). > > From 'scratch' both (vanilla and -vanilla) work fine. > > Cheers, > Ferdy Exactly what happened to me, segfault on one comp and out of memory on another... agriffis@gentoo.org 2005-08-17 13:05:20 0000 ok, 1.5.10 is in portage now