101407 2005-08-04 21:24 0000 www-servers/cherokee-0.4.25 failed 2006-08-23 07:40:18 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Server unspecified x86 Linux RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST P2 normal --- 1 fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de www-servers@gentoo.org fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de 2005-08-04 21:24:49 0000 www-servers/cherokee-0.4.25 seems to be ... kind of untested: patch cherokee-0.4.21-no-handler_admin.diff needs work to fit with new version. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. jakub@gentoo.org 2005-08-05 00:06:57 0000 Could you be more verbose? Some error messages? Or did you mean that the patch does not apply? fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de 2005-08-05 01:43:05 0000 excuse me, i meant the patch did not apply. fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de 2005-08-05 01:44:42 0000 i tried on two different boxes yesterday and today with same results. jakub@gentoo.org 2005-08-05 02:53:21 0000 You forgot to reopen. fritz.heinrichmeyer@fernuni-hagen.de 2005-08-05 05:10:32 0000 after commenting out the patch line (28) in ebuild it failed in line 54 of ebuild file as by commenting out a continuation line was broken. Of course it is easy to repair the patch file. ka0ttic@gentoo.org 2005-08-05 10:13:11 0000 Yeah seems like the maintainer doesnt test things before committing... the patch doesn't apply. Also, as you pointed out, you cannot comment out a line with a line continuation character and expect it to still work. Yet another thing that would've been caught had it been tested. Fixed. bass@gentoo.org 2005-08-06 17:57:12 0000 yes, i tested it before committed. just i commited the worng ebuild. I will repair it when im at home regards jakub@gentoo.org 2006-08-23 07:40:18 0000 Try with something recent, this version doesn't even exist in portage, it's been removed half year ago.