<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>101051</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-08-01 19:12 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>net-mail/uw-imap abuse USE=pic</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-05-17 13:51:02 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>vapier@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>net-mail@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>jer@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>qa@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vapier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-08-01 19:12:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>uw-imap has incorrect pic handling

the package should be fixed to always utilize PIC correctly and drop the USE=pic</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ferdy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-06 13:09:51 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>net-mail/uw-imap-2004g-r1 fixes this.

Thanks
Ferdy</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-06 13:51:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Actually no, it doesn&apos;t.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-06 15:08:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>200g-r2 fixes it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-10-06 15:09:04 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>That was &quot;2004g-r2&quot;, of course. Sorry.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vapier@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-11 19:02:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ok, but 2004g-r1 is still stable for all arches while 2004g-r2 is in ~arch for a
few arches while totally lacking KEYWORDS for the rest</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ticho@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-12 01:23:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>That would be because all keywords were removed from -r1 in bug #105313, and I
later based -r2 on -r1, with KEYWORDS it had at that time. Arch teams continued
to add their keywords into -r1 as per bug #108206.

CCing relevant arch teams. Sorry for this miscomunication.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>corsair@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-21 08:25:13 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>huh... ~ppc64 finaly readded. sorry for being so late...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>josejx@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-07 19:13:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marked ~ppc.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jer@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-09 08:53:42 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Marked ~hppa.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-23 05:13:36 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>re-added ~amd64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>halcy0n@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-03-18 22:34:11 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Adding alpha since they are the only ones that don&apos;t have it stable.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>ferdy@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-05-17 13:51:02 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Done, sorry for the loooong delay.

- ferdy</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>