<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>100686</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-07-29 03:44 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-2.1.1 contains vulnerable version of zlib</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-08-02 02:06:54 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Security</product>
          <component>Vulnerabilities</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>AMD64</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          <status_whiteboard>A1 [glsa]</status_whiteboard>
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>critical</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>Storklerk@ariolc.dyndns.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>security@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>amd64@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>Storklerk@ariolc.dyndns.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-29 03:44:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-2.1.1 contains a 32bit version of zlib. 
The tarball contains the file emul/linux/x86/lib/libz.so.1.2.2 , which 
according to GLSA-200507-19 is affected by a buffer overflow and potentially 
execution of arbitrary code. 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge =app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-2.1.1  
  
Actual Results:  
This installs /emul/linux/x86/lib/libz.so.1.2.2  

Expected Results:  
Installation of /emul/linux/x86/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 

This is a CRITICAL flaw!  
If you want to use flash on amd64, you need to use a 32bit browser. Which will  
use a 32bit zlib. Which is right now a vulnerable version.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-29 06:00:47 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>AMD64 team, I guess you need to push a new baselibs package to fix this...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-29 06:42:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>i&apos;ll provide an updated version asap</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-29 08:15:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>emul-linux-x86-baselibs-2.2.tar.bz2 is in /space/distfiles-local on toucan, in
four hours i&apos;ll put the bumped ebuild into the tree</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-29 12:19:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>ebuild is in portage and marked stable on all arches (what a wonder)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>willie@froq.net</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-30 10:18:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>If I try to compile Wine now (manually, using gcc32/ no chroot), it fails when 
linking zlib - ld doesn&apos;t seem to recognize libz.so.1.2.3 (&quot;ldconfig -v&quot; lists 
it, the Flash plugin works - but ld fails)... After downgrading to 
baselibs-2.1.1, everything works again. </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>gpiez@web.de</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-30 11:28:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Version 2.2 doesn&apos;t have libgmodule-1.2.so.0 anymore. This is needed for  
configuring turboprint (commercial 32 bit printer driver for canon etc):  
 
cruncher ~ # xtpsetup 
xtpsetup: error while loading shared libraries: libgmodule-1.2.so.0: cannot 
open shared object file: No such file or directory 
 
After downgrading again, xtpsetup works again. 
 </thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>blubb@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-30 11:35:45 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>In reply to comment 5:
Please open another bug for this, but try 2.2.2 first (not yet in portage, but
will be commited in a few hours)

In reply to comment 6:
I&apos;m aware of that, will be fixed with 2.2.2. You may want have a look at bug 100795</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>koon@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-30 12:42:12 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>GLSA 200507-28</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jaervosz@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-08-02 02:06:54 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>[10:43:43] &lt;blubb&gt; the problem is: since my emul-linux-x86-baselibs-2.2 had 
lots of problems, Herbs created 2.1.2, which also fixes the hole and removed 
the broken 2.2, but the GLSA still says &lt;2.2 is vulnerable 
 
GLSA updated </thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>