There used to be an issue in Bugzilla which caused activity data to be lost if there were a large number of cc's or dependencies. That has been fixed, but some data was already lost in your activity table that could not be regenerated. The changes that the script could not reliably determine are prefixed by '?'.

Who When What Removed Added
fauli@gentoo.org 2008-02-19 19:52:03 0000 CC opfer@gentoo.org
Status Whiteboard ?? [ebuild]
py@gentoo.org 2008-02-19 19:55:07 0000 Status NEW ASSIGNED
Summary www-client/opera-9.25 www-client/opera < 9.26 multiple vulns
Status Whiteboard ?? [ebuild] B? [ebuild]
jaervosz@gentoo.org 2008-02-20 13:59:34 0000 CC sparc@gentoo.org, ppc@gentoo.org, release@gentoo.org, amd64@gentoo.org, x86@gentoo.org
Status Whiteboard B? [ebuild] B? [stable]
fauli@gentoo.org 2008-02-20 19:07:54 0000 CC x86@gentoo.org
armin76@gentoo.org 2008-02-21 12:25:24 0000 CC sparc@gentoo.org
py@gentoo.org 2008-02-21 21:44:42 0000 URL http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2008/02/14/9-26-coming-soon http://secunia.com/advisories/29029/
Severity normal minor
Summary www-client/opera < 9.26 multiple vulns www-client/opera < 9.26 multiple vulnerabilities
Status Whiteboard B? [stable] B4 [stable]
dertobi123@gentoo.org 2008-02-22 14:00:45 0000 CC ppc@gentoo.org
beandog@gentoo.org 2008-02-25 19:39:27 0000 CC amd64@gentoo.org
jaervosz@gentoo.org 2008-02-25 20:18:32 0000 Status Whiteboard B4 [stable] B4 [glsa?]
pva@gentoo.org 2008-02-25 20:41:01 0000 CC release@gentoo.org
rbu@gentoo.org 2008-02-25 22:24:07 0000 Status Whiteboard B4 [glsa?] B3 [glsa?]
jaervosz@gentoo.org 2008-02-26 10:02:56 0000 Status Whiteboard B3 [glsa?] B3 [glsa]
rbu@gentoo.org 2008-03-03 00:01:48 0000 Summary www-client/opera < 9.26 multiple vulnerabilities www-client/opera < 9.26 multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2008-{1080,1081,1082})
py@gentoo.org 2008-03-04 22:40:00 0000 Alias CVE-2008-1080
Status ASSIGNED RESOLVED
Resolution FIXED

Back to bug 210260