Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 87525 Details for
Bug 134377
groff-1.19.1 CJK patch
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
review log by solar and SpanKY
irc-tailed.log (text/plain), 1.80 KB, created by
hiyuh
on 2006-05-25 21:26:52 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
review log by solar and SpanKY
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
hiyuh
Created:
2006-05-25 21:26:52 UTC
Size:
1.80 KB
patch
obsolete
>5/26 12:42:39 hiyuh > solar: groff-1.19 + japanese patch is. please see bug 134377 >5/26 12:42:40 jeeves > hiyuh: http://bugs.gentoo.org/134377 nor, P2, All, loudear@iswebnet.com-bug-wranglers@gentoo.org, NEW, pending, groff-1.19.1 CJK patch >5/26 12:43:15 hiyuh > or SpanKY? :9 >5/26 12:48:54 solar > hiyuh: do you have to use use cjk && epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${P}-japanese-r5111.patch ? >5/26 12:49:09 solar > ie is the conditional patching a must? >5/26 12:52:04 solar > ahh it forces wchar. >5/26 12:53:25 hiyuh > solar: yeah, but maybe it's not unnecessarily for non-cjk peaple. and then, the patch seems be so huge, though. :P >5/26 12:53:37 solar > it is very large >5/26 12:54:26 hiyuh > yeah, should it be in distfiles dir? >5/26 12:54:34 solar > sorta would worrie that with it being so large and conditional that it would prevent any other patching which we may have todo >5/26 12:54:46 solar > prevent as in conflict easy >5/26 12:55:21 solar > looking at the .18.1 ebuild it did not look like you had todo any condtional patching at all >5/26 12:55:34 solar > know what happened betwen the releases? >5/26 12:57:11 hiyuh > sorry, dunno that detail. but cjk patch for 1.18 which is in portage couldn't apply to 1.19. >5/26 13:01:30 solar > understood thats fine. >5/26 13:03:43 hiyuh > solar: k, some japanese users can test/poke it at this weekend or so on. then, you can put it into tree? >5/26 13:05:31 solar > I'd rather SpanKY review and decide on the conditional patching >5/26 13:05:41 hiyuh > I see. >5/26 13:06:01 solar > also any idea why it's not gone upstream? >5/26 13:07:13 hiyuh > well, one of the problems is the patch is very large, IMHO. >5/26 13:07:40 SpanKY > yeah, it'd have to be compressed and put on mirrors >5/26 13:07:46 SpanKY > i'd prefer one of our cjk devs review it >5/26 13:08:35 hiyuh > SpanKY++
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 134377
:
87523
|
87524
| 87525 |
87535
|
87972
|
87974
|
90268
|
91745