Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 77288 Details for
Bug 111340
There's no gnat 2005 ebuild
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
reply from AdaCore re their intended versioning scheme
AdaCore.let3 (text/plain), 3.99 KB, created by
George Shapovalov (RETIRED)
on 2006-01-16 12:11:55 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
reply from AdaCore re their intended versioning scheme
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
George Shapovalov (RETIRED)
Created:
2006-01-16 12:11:55 UTC
Size:
3.99 KB
patch
obsolete
>From dewar@adacore.com Sun Jan 15 18:53:08 2006 >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-gr0 (2005-09-13) on aldar.unige.ch >X-Spam-Level: >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham > version=3.1.0-gr0 >X-Gmail-Received: 7b106e59be4f6f6717285cb57d2f598b1951b3e9 >Delivered-To: gshapovalov@gmail.com >Received: by 10.36.140.15 with SMTP id n15cs16730nzd; > Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:53:11 -0800 (PST) >Received: by 10.36.77.16 with SMTP id z16mr4355713nza; > Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:53:11 -0800 (PST) >Return-Path: <dewar@adacore.com> >Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) > by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 36si2517976nza.2006.01.15.09.53.11; > Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:53:11 -0800 (PST) >Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 134.68.220.30 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of dewar@adacore.com) >Received: from nile.gnat.com ([205.232.38.5]) > by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) > id 1EyC3z-00016E-6M > for george@gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:53:11 +0000 >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB0D48CC19 > for <george@gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:53:08 -0500 (EST) >Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP > id 09011-01-8 for <george@gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:53:08 -0500 (EST) >Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dhcp10.gnat.com [205.232.38.232]) > by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7156648CBE0 > for <george@gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:53:08 -0500 (EST) >Message-ID: <43CA8C04.9020608@adacore.com> >Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:53:08 -0500 >From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> >User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) >X-Accept-Language: en-us, en >MIME-Version: 1.0 >To: George Shapovalov <george@gentoo.org> >Subject: Re: inclusion og gnat-gpl-2005 in Gentoo Linux >References: <200601141738.25754.george@gentoo.org> <200601141825.57882.george@gentoo.org> <43C936CF.2070700@adacore.com> <200601151712.04378.george@gentoo.org> >In-Reply-To: <200601151712.04378.george@gentoo.org> >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nile.gnat.com >X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500000, version=1.0.1 >X-UID: >Status: R >X-Status: NC >X-KMail-EncryptionState: >X-KMail-SignatureState: >X-KMail-MDN-Sent: > >George Shapovalov wrote: > >>Dear Robert. >> >>Thanks for yor replies. >>I have another question, this time about versioning of gnat-gpl releases. >>Normally we are trying to stick as close as possible to what upstream >>provides. However in this case in gnat-gpl-2005 the 2005 part seems related >>to the language standard rather than a particular release number. You >>mentioned that the package name will change with a new release. Could you >>please elaborate on the expected naming/versioning scheme? I would like to >>follow it if possible with our ebuilds. >> >> >not yet decided > >>Right now we are debating whether to go with a gnat-gpl-2005 name, followed >>by, possibly 2006.1, 2006.2.. or to go with a backend gcc versions adding a >>specific gnat release number, thus making it 3.4.5.1 for this release, >>3.4.5.2 for another gcc-3.4.5 based and so on.. >> >> >if the sources are not identical, it would be good for your name to >distinguish itself somehow > >>Since we have to repackage and mirror source ourselves (as we discussed), this >>is easy to do and gives us an added benefit of simpler SLOT logic - this is a >>way we track ABI/API incompatible versions that can be installed in parallel, >>as the SLOT logic then will be common for both gnat-gpl and gnat-gcc (the FSF >>provided compiler). But if 2005 stands for a particular release number and >>you are planning to release gnat-gpl-2006 in the future then the first option >>becomes a natural choice for us to follow. >> >> >2005 is indeed a reference to the language version, and we have >not yet decided how to rename the next version. > >>Thanks! >> >>George >> >> > > >
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 111340
:
75917
|
75918
|
76484
|
76485
|
76486
|
76488
|
76493
|
76780
|
76781
|
76784
|
76785
|
77129
|
77130
| 77288 |
77374
|
85982
|
87502