Go to:
Gentoo Home
Documentation
Forums
Lists
Bugs
Planet
Store
Wiki
Get Gentoo!
Gentoo's Bugzilla – Attachment 350016 Details for
Bug 446616
net-p2p/ctcs: unclear license
Home
|
New
–
[Ex]
|
Browse
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Requests
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
Reply from Dennis Holmes
ctcs.mail (text/plain), 3.57 KB, created by
Ulrich Müller
on 2013-06-03 21:25:09 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
Reply from Dennis Holmes
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Ulrich Müller
Created:
2013-06-03 21:25:09 UTC
Size:
3.57 KB
patch
obsolete
>Received: from mailgate1.kph.uni-mainz.de (mailgate1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.132.81]) > by mail.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r53JpmuE066208 > (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) > for <ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 21:51:59 +0200 (CEST) > (envelope-from dholmes@liberator.dyndns.org) >Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) > by mailgate1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r53Joikx082655 > for <ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 21:51:01 +0200 (CEST) > (envelope-from dholmes@liberator.dyndns.org) >Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) > id 1A61833E0B2; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:50:38 +0000 (UTC) >Delivered-To: ulm@gentoo.org >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACAF33DF72 > for <ulm@gentoo.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:50:38 +0000 (UTC) >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org >X-Spam-Score: 0 >X-Spam-Level: >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI > autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 >Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) > by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) > with ESMTP id bSBAxpEBehrO for <ulm@gentoo.org>; > Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:50:32 +0000 (UTC) >Received: from liberator.dyndns.org (64-142-6-3.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.6.3]) > (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) > (No client certificate requested) > by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EBAF33DD01 > for <ulm@gentoo.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:50:26 +0000 (UTC) >Received: from star-one.liberator.dyndns.org (localhost.liberator.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) > by liberator.dyndns.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r53JoP9q025506 > for <ulm@gentoo.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:50:25 -0700 (PDT) > (envelope-from dholmes@star-one.liberator.dyndns.org) >Received: (from dholmes@localhost) > by star-one.liberator.dyndns.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id r53JoPZ5025505 > for ulm@gentoo.org; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:50:25 -0700 (PDT) > (envelope-from dholmes) >Message-Id: <201306031950.r53JoPZ5025505@star-one.liberator.dyndns.org> >In-Reply-To: <20864.57779.806678.276154@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> >X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >From: Dennis Holmes <dholmes@liberator.dyndns.org> >To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> >Subject: Re: ctcs distribution terms? >Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:50:25 -0700 (PDT) > >Look what Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm a developer for the Gentoo Linux distribution and member of their >> licenses team. Currently we are doing an audit of packages' licenses >> and came across the ctcs package. The perl script includes only a >> short warranty disclaimer, but otherwise it doesn't say anything about >> its distribution terms. >> >> So I wonder if you could clarify (by PGP signed e-mail, if possible) >> if the ctcs-1.4.1.tar.gz tarball can be redistributed, and if yes, >> under what license? >> >> There's also an open bug about the issue in our bug tracker: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446616 >> >> Kind regards, >> Ulrich M?ller > >Apologies for the delayed reply. CTCS is considered part of the >Enhanced CTorrent project, so the response I've given to others in the >past is that the same GPL applies to it as to CTorrent. > >+----------------+-----------------+----------------------------------+ >| Dennis Holmes |dholmes@rahul.net| "We demand rigidly defined areas | >| San Jose, CA +-----------------+ of doubt and uncertainty!" | >+----=>{ Meanwhile, as Ford said: "Where are my potato chips?" }<=----+
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 446616
: 350016