First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 96660
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@ThinRope.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
djbdns-1.05-r14.ebuild.diff djbdns-1.05-r14.ebuild.diff patch Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2005-06-20 21:39 0000 549 bytes Details | Diff
djbdns-1.05-r14.ebuild.diff djbdns-1.05-r14.ebuild.diff {fixed} patch Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2005-06-20 21:54 0000 1.29 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 96660 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 96660 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-06-20 21:37 0000 
There is a newer ipv6 patch from http://www.fefe.de/dns/, please update the
ebuild (go to -r15).


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:




This is the difference between test21 and test22 (in djbdns-1.05/okclient.c):

-static char fn[3 + IP4_FMT];
+static char fn[3 + IP6_FMT];

and it seems good enough for a revbump.

------- Comment #1 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2005-06-20 21:39:25 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=61612) [edit]
djbdns-1.05-r14.ebuild.diff

Adding the proposed patch, just update to test22.

------- Comment #2 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2005-06-20 21:54:58 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=61613) [edit]
djbdns-1.05-r14.ebuild.diff {fixed}

Better and tested patch to teh ebuild.

------- Comment #3 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2005-06-21 07:49:02 0000 ------- 
I'll take care of this, just let me look at it before.

------- Comment #4 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2005-06-21 08:24:58 0000 ------- 
Committed it, but I used a slight different way to simplify ipv6 patch 
handling. 
 
Thanks for reporting.

------- Comment #5 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2005-06-21 16:35:30 0000 ------- 
OK, just synced and upgraded. Your patch seems better :-)
Thnak you for the quick response.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug