First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 96229
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chad Patten <cpatten@cpatten.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 96229 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 96229 blocks: 96092

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-06-15 17:09 0000
The Blackdown project's JDK and JRE for the x86 and AMD64 platforms is
vulnerable to the same privilege escalation bug that affects Sun JDK/JRE < 1.4.2_08.

Reproducible: Didn't try
Steps to Reproduce:




Please refer to reference security notice on Blackdown project's site.

------- Comment #1 From Chad Patten 2005-06-15 17:19:36 0000 -------
A new version which fixes the vulnerability, 1.4.2-02, has been released by
blackdown.org.

------- Comment #2 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-06-15 22:04:13 0000 -------
Java please bump. 
 
This is similar to bug #96092. 

------- Comment #3 From Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 02:40:26 0000 -------
bumped too ~arch
haven't had time todo more then a basic test

------- Comment #4 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 08:56:19 0000 -------
From Blackdown :
Affected : Blackdown J2SE 1.4.2-01 and earlier 1.4 releases.  1.3.1 release are
not affected.

Target KEYWORDS :
blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 : x86 sparc amd64
blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 : x86 sparc amd64

------- Comment #5 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2005-06-16 09:49:28 0000 -------
blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.02 is currently failing digest checks on the file from the
mirrors.  I don't know if the mirror is wrong or the digest is wrong.

------- Comment #6 From Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 10:14:52 0000 -------
digest md5 is the same as on
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/security/Blackdown-SA-2005-02.
txt
and all the mirrors i tried have the file with that md5

------- Comment #7 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2005-06-16 10:37:37 0000 -------
It was on amd64 (sorry, I didn't realize blackdown came in 64-bit versions) and
is now fixed.

------- Comment #8 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 10:57:09 0000 -------
Blackdown never release 1.4.2* for sparc.
Is there a workaround for 1.4.1?

------- Comment #9 From Jan Brinkmann (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 11:36:39 0000 -------
stable on amd64 and x86

------- Comment #10 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-06-16 15:10:45 0000 -------
I sent an email off to Blackdown asking about a newer version of the JRE/JDK
for
Linux/SPARC and the response was "1.4.2-02 for SPARC is mostly ready but
there's
one show-stopping bug holding it up.".  So its possible there may be something
soon, but not sure when.

------- Comment #11 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-06-17 02:55:23 0000 -------
We should issue a temporary GLSA with the current fixed versions which says 1.4
on sparc is vulnerable, then issue an update when the sparc version is released.

------- Comment #12 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-06-19 12:03:29 0000 -------
GLSA 200506-14
Keeping open (enhancement scope) to remember to update the GLSA when sparc is fixed.

------- Comment #13 From Jukka Palko 2005-06-20 05:33:28 0000 -------
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02"

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies   
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02" have been
masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.02 (masked by: -* keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
section 2.2 "Software Availability" in the Gentoo Handbook.

http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200506-14.xml

------- Comment #14 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-06-20 05:42:39 0000 -------
Jan, please mark jre asap. 

------- Comment #15 From Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) 2005-06-20 05:57:08 0000 -------
keyworded x86 & amd64

------- Comment #16 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-06-20 06:33:12 0000 -------
Thx Thomas, back to enhancement, waiting for fixed Sparc version. 

------- Comment #17 From Adir Abraham 2005-11-15 03:42:09 0000 -------
Any news with the Sparc version?

------- Comment #18 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-11-15 04:48:18 0000 -------
No.

------- Comment #19 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-03-22 12:39:20 0000 -------
Any news on a sparc version?

------- Comment #20 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-03-22 14:13:45 0000 -------
You should check www.blackdown.org, and the answer is no.
Note that the current stable profile (2006.0/2.4) has java masked entirely, so
when the previous ones are gone it can be safely nuked.

------- Comment #21 From Petteri Räty 2006-07-30 00:02:29 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> You should check www.blackdown.org, and the answer is no.
> Note that the current stable profile (2006.0/2.4) has java masked entirely, so
> when the previous ones are gone it can be safely nuked.
> 

When do you plan on removing the previous ones?

------- Comment #22 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-07-30 08:48:37 0000 -------
When 2006.1 ships

------- Comment #23 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-09-05 05:26:58 0000 -------
Jason any news on this one?

------- Comment #24 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-09-05 08:17:20 0000 -------
We'll deprecate the 2005.1 profile later today, send a mail with a 30-day
warning period and nuke java keywords/old profiles then.

------- Comment #25 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-10-05 11:27:28 0000 -------
the sparc cleanup is done, removed all java-dependant keywords from ebuilds and
nuked the old profiles.
feel free to call us back if you feel nostalgic or something ;)

------- Comment #26 From Matt Drew 2006-10-24 05:15:46 0000 -------
So ... do we even need a GLSA update on this now that sparc has been purged? 
Close it?

------- Comment #27 From Raphael Marichez 2006-10-24 05:29:14 0000 -------
Thanks Matt.  indeed the policy doesn't talk about this configuration in which
a package has been removed for the unpatched architecture. I think no GLSA nor
GLSA-update is needed to be sent. And the note in GLSA 200506-14 is still true:

"Note to SPARC users: There is no stable secure Blackdown Java for the SPARC
architecture. Affected users should remove the package until a SPARC package is
released. "

So I close that bug (finally :)  ) . Feel free to reopen if you disagree.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug