Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 95768 - kde 3.4.1 and kde-meta 3.4.1 differ re: kdesdk
Summary: kde 3.4.1 and kde-meta 3.4.1 differ re: kdesdk
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] KDE (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-11 05:15 UTC by Peter Hyman
Modified: 2005-06-14 09:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Hyman 2005-06-11 05:15:36 UTC
The monolithic kde-3.4.1 ebuild excludes kdesdk. kde-meta 3.4.1 specifically
includes kdesdk. The comment in the monolithic ebuild was that kdebindings and
kdesdk were excluded since they were for developers. I believe monolithic and
meta ebuilds should be consistent.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. compare kde-3.4.1.ebuild and kde-meta-3.4.1.ebuild
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
monolithic ebuild contains...
# excluded: kdebindings, kdesdk, since these are developer-only packages
RDEPEND="~kde-base/kdelibs-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdebase-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeaddons-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeadmin-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeartwork-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeedu-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdegames-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdegraphics-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdemultimedia-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdenetwork-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdepim-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdetoys-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeutils-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdewebdev-${PV}
	accessibility? ( ~kde-base/kdeaccessibility-${PV} )"

meta ebuild contains...
RDEPEND="
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeaddons-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeadmin-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdebase-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeedu-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdegames-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdegraphics-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdemultimedia-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdenetwork-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdepim-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdesdk-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdetoys-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeutils-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeartwork-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdewebdev-meta)
accessibility? ( $(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeaccessibility-meta) )"

Expected Results:  
same packages pulled in by both.

Personally, I like the idea of kdesdk coming in. Lots of useful tools even for
the user there! This _could_ cause an issue with people migrating from
monolithic to split ebuilds.
Comment 1 Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-14 09:18:09 UTC
I don't think the inclusion of kdesdk was intentional, so it's better to 
remove it for now to stay consistent with the monolithic ebuilds and with the 
way it has been until now. 
 
We should wait for future major versions to decide if it should be readded. 
(btw, I'm quite on the opposide side here, I think also kdewebdev could be 
trimmed from kde-meta...).