First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 95768
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo KDE team <kde@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Peter Hyman <pete4abw@comcast.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 95768 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 95768 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-06-11 05:15 0000
The monolithic kde-3.4.1 ebuild excludes kdesdk. kde-meta 3.4.1 specifically
includes kdesdk. The comment in the monolithic ebuild was that kdebindings and
kdesdk were excluded since they were for developers. I believe monolithic and
meta ebuilds should be consistent.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. compare kde-3.4.1.ebuild and kde-meta-3.4.1.ebuild
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
monolithic ebuild contains...
# excluded: kdebindings, kdesdk, since these are developer-only packages
RDEPEND="~kde-base/kdelibs-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdebase-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeaddons-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeadmin-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeartwork-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeedu-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdegames-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdegraphics-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdemultimedia-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdenetwork-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdepim-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdetoys-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdeutils-${PV}
	~kde-base/kdewebdev-${PV}
	accessibility? ( ~kde-base/kdeaccessibility-${PV} )"

meta ebuild contains...
RDEPEND="
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeaddons-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeadmin-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdebase-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeedu-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdegames-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdegraphics-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdemultimedia-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdenetwork-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdepim-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdesdk-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdetoys-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeutils-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeartwork-meta)
$(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdewebdev-meta)
accessibility? ( $(deprange $PV $MAXKDEVER kde-base/kdeaccessibility-meta) )"

Expected Results:  
same packages pulled in by both.

Personally, I like the idea of kdesdk coming in. Lots of useful tools even for
the user there! This _could_ cause an issue with people migrating from
monolithic to split ebuilds.

------- Comment #1 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-06-14 09:18:09 0000 -------
I don't think the inclusion of kdesdk was intentional, so it's better to 
remove it for now to stay consistent with the monolithic ebuilds and with the 
way it has been until now. 
 
We should wait for future major versions to decide if it should be readded. 
(btw, I'm quite on the opposide side here, I think also kdewebdev could be 
trimmed from kde-meta...). 
 

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug