First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 94040
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Default Assignee for Orphaned Packages <maintainer-needed@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Eugene Pavlovsky <heilong@bluebottle.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 94040 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 94040 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-05-26 00:13 0000
le has been update to 1.12.1 for a long while, but portage has a much older
version. and, the version i tried to compile from sources complain about
l/usr/include/linux/list.h (list.h:222: error: expected ',' or '...' before
'new') - maybe because it's compiled by g++.  gcc i used for this compile is
gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r2, gentoo-sources is 2.6.11-r9, linux-headers 2.6.11. when i
moved /usr/include/linux out of the way and made "ln -s
/usr/src/linux/include/linux /usr/include/linux", the compile succeeded - must
be a bug in linux-headers?
anyway, it'd be cool if you add new version of le to the portage and fix the
compilation issue

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc 2005-05-26 02:44:29 0000 -------
As for the compile bug, try to re-emerge linux-headers... 

------- Comment #2 From Eugene Pavlovsky 2005-06-16 06:02:36 0000 -------
I've got linux-headers-2.6.11-r1 (the latest as of 2005-16-06), and le won't
compile. When I remove /usr/include/linux and use my kernel's
(vanilla-sources-2.6.12-rc5), the compilation succeeds.

------- Comment #3 From Eugene Pavlovsky 2005-07-12 09:04:43 0000 -------
I can't use my apps without anti-aliasing, complete eyestrain! My other linux
system running slackware anti-aliases these fonts just fine.

------- Comment #4 From Eugene Pavlovsky 2005-07-12 09:06:02 0000 -------
this comment was to the wrong bug. le is 1.12.4 already (still the same stuff
with the latest gentoo's linux-headers; headers from vanilla-sources-2.6.12 work
fine)

------- Comment #5 From Harald van Dijk 2006-02-05 17:06:47 0000 -------
1.12.5 added, with a workaround for this bug.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug