Bug 91936 – dev-libs/boost keywording request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Marcelo Goes (RETIRED) 2005-05-08 13:57:56 UTC]

Hello there,

dev-libs/quantlib introduced a dependency on dev-libs/boost and I was forced to drop keywords on alpha, hppa and mips.
I would like to know if boost can be keyworded if it works in those arches.

Thanks

[Comment 1 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2005-05-20 23:31:20 UTC]

boost should work on any system with a sane toolchain, hoping to hear from the
arch teams on this

[Comment 2 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-05-29 13:07:06 UTC]

Both of them re-keyworded ~alpha

Cheers,
Ferdy

[Comment 3 Grant Goodyear (RETIRED) 2005-06-22 07:50:30 UTC]

Speaking of which, can we start keywording 1.32.0-r* stable?  I'll verify on
amd64 and x86.

[Comment 4 Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-06-22 13:58:04 UTC]

Speaking of which, too, we are interested in having boost-1.32 marked stable 
to mark KDE 3.4 stable, do you think it can happen soon? 
Setting a blocker on bug 94223. 

[Comment 5 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2005-07-01 15:56:17 UTC]

i see no reason not to keyword it stable
this is actually me looking through the open boost bugs to determine if there is
anything but feature requests
even one bug requesting bjam to be installed is more of a feature request, i
will finish checking bugs then marking stable

[Comment 6 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2005-07-06 21:05:49 UTC]

ok, don't hold your breath, one of the deps icc, aparently wont see a stable
ic8.x and they will wait and push icc9

so no stable kde 3.4.x too soon if you need boost 1.32.0 , the other two deps
should be able to be stabelized with some polite poking of g2boojum maybe

just fyi

[Comment 7 Marcelo Goes (RETIRED) 2005-07-06 21:23:10 UTC]

Daniel,

Maybe a separate ebuild without an icc USE flag can be stabilized in the meanwhile?

[Comment 8 Aaron Walker (RETIRED) 2005-08-05 21:02:21 UTC]

Added ~mips.

[Comment 9 Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-08-21 10:04:53 UTC]

Any news wrt comments #6 and #7? 

[Comment 10 Rutger ter Borg 2005-10-09 05:05:39 UTC]

 
any news with respect to #6, #7 and #9? 
 
 

[Comment 11 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2005-10-25 13:23:03 UTC]

the latest news is that i don't even know if there will be a stable icc9 or not,
worst case USE=icc would have to be deprecated then

[Comment 12 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2005-10-25 21:00:41 UTC]

icc support deprecated, now ebuild can go through usual process for stabelization

[Comment 13 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2005-11-06 07:57:59 UTC]

using this existing bug to ask the archs to stable 1.33.0-r1 instead of creating
a new one

[Comment 14 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-11-09 04:56:27 UTC]

sparc boosted!

[Comment 15 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2006-01-21 08:08:56 UTC]

Removing hppa as keywording appears to be fine and has been for a while. Feel free to re-CC if this change seems inappropriate.

[Comment 16 Disenchanted (RETIRED) 2006-01-29 10:30:03 UTC]

correct me if i'm wrong, but this should be taken care of

[Comment 17 Marcelo Goes (RETIRED) 2006-01-29 10:47:26 UTC]

As far as I am concerned, it is. :-)