First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 89250
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo TreeCleaner Project <treecleaner@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: James Rowe <jnrowe@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
wdiff-tputs_from_ncurses.patch wdiff-tputs_from_ncurses.patch patch James Rowe 2005-04-15 21:12 0000 374 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 89250 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 89250 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-04-15 21:12 0000
Since the current ebuild switches the configure script to use ncurses
instead of the the termcap support from sys-libs/libtermcap-compat configure
fails to pick up tput definitions.  This means we can't get pretty output
from wdiff's -t mode, in fact we don't get any output at all.

  The attached patch just forces HAVE_TPUTS on, which results in ncurses'
defined tputs being used.  Yes, the autotools files could be patched to
provide the same result but it seems like overkill for something so
small.

  And eww context diffs ;)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From James Rowe 2005-04-15 21:12:45 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=56404) [edit]
wdiff-tputs_from_ncurses.patch

------- Comment #2 From James Rowe 2006-07-29 21:54:48 0000 -------
  Having caused me to rethink this bug a little I have a question: How
against adding a 7 year old beta release, the latest release, which actually
fixes this issue amongst other things would you be?

  If it is acceptable I'll do more than 5 minutes testing I've given it
this morning and submit an updated ebuild if the beta release is stable.

Thanks,


James

------- Comment #3 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2006-07-29 22:02:56 0000 -------
7 years since the last release? dayum.  go for it, it's certainly had a long
beta period.

------- Comment #4 From James Rowe 2006-08-03 21:22:25 0000 -------
>   If it is acceptable I'll do more than 5 minutes testing I've given it
> this morning and submit an updated ebuild if the beta release is stable.

  Having given it some more testing I don't feel it is appropriate to use
the beta release.

------- Comment #5 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2008-02-28 09:51:03 0000 -------
Someone either updated it w/ some of those ~90s 'updates' from
http://wdiff.progiciels-bpi.ca/archives, or apply this patch, or punt it.

Tired of having the bug sitting in bugzilla for 3 years.

------- Comment #6 From Raúl Porcel 2008-03-24 19:48:39 0000 -------
Fixed

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug