Bugzilla Bug 88900

I'll attach an ebuild patch, gtkhtml has been moved to gnome-python-extras, and
I updated the dependencies with the contents of configure.in

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Created an attachment (id=56125) [edit]
patch gnome-python-2.6.1 to 2.10.0

Created an attachment (id=56126) [edit]
gnome-python-extra-2.10.1

Ebuild for gnome-python-extras, split out from gnome-python.
gnome-python-extras uses gtkhml, that was in gnome-python-2.6.1. This ebuild
uses the same depends for mozilla/firefox as epiphany, to satisfy gtkmozembed.

The url for this bug is the extras NEWS file, this is the correct NEWS file for
gnome-pyhton-2.10.0
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-python/gnome-python/NEWS?view=markup

patch doesn't work:

haim@parker tmp $ patch gnome-python-2.6.1.ebuild patch
patching file gnome-python-2.6.1.ebuild
Hunk #1 FAILED at 7.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gnome-python-2.6.1.ebuild.rej

haim@parker tmp $ cat gnome-python-2.6.1.ebuild.rej
***************
*** 7,48 ****
  DESCRIPTION="GNOME 2 bindings for Python"
  HOMEPAGE="http://www.pygtk.org/"

- IUSE="gtkhtml"
  LICENSE="LGPL-2"
  SLOT="2"
  KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc ~alpha ~sparc ~amd64"

  RDEPEND=">=dev-lang/python-2.2
-       >=dev-python/pygtk-2.4
        >=dev-python/pyorbit-2.0.1
-       >=dev-libs/glib-2
-       >=x11-libs/gtk+-2
-       >=gnome-base/libgnome-2
-       >=gnome-base/libgnomeui-2
-       >=gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2
-       >=gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2
-       >=gnome-base/gconf-1.2
-       >=x11-libs/libzvt-2
-       >=gnome-base/libbonobo-2
-       >=gnome-base/libbonoboui-2
-       >=gnome-base/nautilus-2
-       >=gnome-base/gnome-panel-2
        >=gnome-base/libgnomeprint-2.2
-       >=gnome-base/libgnomeprintui-2.2
-       gtkhtml? ( =gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-2* )"

  DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
        >=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.12.0"

  # Skip test, to avoid gnome-python-2.0 block (fixes bug 72594)
  RESTRICT="maketest"
- DOCS="AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog INSTALL NEWS README"

  src_unpack() {
        unpack ${A}
-       #cd ${S}
-       #epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-gtkhtml.patch
-       #epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-gtkhtml-atomic.patch
        # disable pyc compiling
        mv ${S}/py-compile ${S}/py-compile.orig
        ln -s /bin/true ${S}/py-compile
--- 7,41 ----
  DESCRIPTION="GNOME 2 bindings for Python"
  HOMEPAGE="http://www.pygtk.org/"

+ IUSE="doc"
  LICENSE="LGPL-2"
  SLOT="2"
  KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc ~alpha ~sparc ~amd64"

  RDEPEND=">=dev-lang/python-2.2
+       >=dev-python/pygtk-2.6
        >=dev-python/pyorbit-2.0.1
+       >=dev-libs/glib-2.6
+       >=x11-libs/gtk+-2.6
+       >=gnome-base/libgnome-2.8
+       >=gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.8
+       >=gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.8
+       >=gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.9
+       >=gnome-base/gconf-2.9
+       >=gnome-base/libbonobo-2.8
+       >=gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.8
        >=gnome-base/libgnomeprint-2.2
+       >=gnome-base/libgnomeprintui-2.2"

  DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
        >=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.12.0"

  # Skip test, to avoid gnome-python-2.0 block (fixes bug 72594)
  RESTRICT="maketest"
+ DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS"

  src_unpack() {
        unpack ${A}
        # disable pyc compiling
        mv ${S}/py-compile ${S}/py-compile.orig
        ln -s /bin/true ${S}/py-compile

thanx
--
Haim

Created an attachment (id=57733) [edit]
gnome-python-2.10.0.ebuild

This should work

It would be also nice to get this stuff in for meld's syntax highlighting.

Created an attachment (id=58314) [edit]
meld-try-gtksourceview-too.patch

This is a patch from meld CVS to let it use pygtksourceview, which is in
gnome-python-extras now.

Created an attachment (id=58628) [edit]
ebuild with libgtkhtml use flag

i propose that use flag and a check for >=gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-2.3.1 be put
again.

IUSE=gtkhtml
libgtkhtml? (>=gnome-extra/libgtkhtml-3.2.5)

to avoid errors like this : (BloGTK without the >=libgtkhtml-2.3 module)

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/BloGTK", line 14, in ?
    import gtkhtml2
ImportError: No module named gtkhtml2

* so sorry, it's not a diff.

(In reply to comment #2)

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but why is the gnome-python-extras ebuild
posted above now crossed out? Does it have something to do with the gtkhtml USE
flag posts?

Try comment #7's ebuild instead. If you look you see they're quite similar.

Bumped, thanks for the ebuild.

kloeri, did you happen to notice that half the point of this bug was the
gnome-python-extras bit? Do you want a new bug for that, or what?

Could gnome-python-2.10 be hard masked until the gtkhtml2 module issue is
solved? Applications using it are all broken for ~arch users with the current
tree, and that's pretty bad.
Thanks.

(Oh, and btw, gnome-python-2.10.0.ebuild still has a gtkhtml IUSE and dep, which
are obsolete and should probably be removed)