Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 88899 - games-strategy/wesnoth-0.9.0 crashes when compiled with -fstack-protector
Summary: games-strategy/wesnoth-0.9.0 crashes when compiled with -fstack-protector
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Games (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Games
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-12 14:23 UTC by David Leverton
Modified: 2005-08-18 23:28 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Leverton 2005-04-12 14:23:26 UTC
When compiled on amd64 with the -fstack-protector flag, wesnoth crashes at the end of a scenario with a stack smashing attack message on the terminal (I forgot to copy down the exact message, but it occurs in the function "LEVEL_RESULT play_level(game_data&, config&, config*, CVideo&, game_state&, std::vector<config*>&)").  The problem /doesn't/ occur in a 32bit chroot on the same machine.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. On an amd64 system: CFLAGS="-fstack-protector ..." emerge wesnoth
2. Run "wesnoth", choose the "Tutorial" menu item and play through the first scenario.
3.

Actual Results:  
Games crashes with "stack smashing" message.

Expected Results:  
Continue to the next scenario in the tutorial.

Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/amd64/2005.0, gcc-3.4.3,
glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1, 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.11-gentoo-r6 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1 [2.3.4 (#2, Mar  1 2005, 21:38:17)]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4-r1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.6.3, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r7
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.14
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r4
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -O2"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env
/usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/
/usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -O2"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/gentoo/
ftp://mirrors.sec.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/gentoo/
http://ftp.du.se/pub/os/gentoo http://ftp.easynet.nl/mirror/gentoo/"
LINGUAS="en_GB"
MAKEOPTS=""
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X aalib acl acpi alsa apache2 arts avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cairo cdr
crypt cups curl dvd esd fam flac font-serverfortran gdbm ggi gif gtk gtk2
imagemagick imlib ipv6 java jp2 jpeg junit kde lcms leim libcaca libwww lzw
lzw-tiff mad mikmod mng motif mozilla mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nptl nptlonly ogg
opengl pam pdflib perl png postgres python qt readline samba sdl speex ssl tcltk
tcpd tetex theora tiff timidity truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts usb
userlocales vorbis xml2 xmms xpm xrandr xv zlib linguas_en_GB"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS
Comment 1 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-04-12 14:50:24 UTC
filtered.
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-04-12 17:00:00 UTC
umm, chances are the game is broken so filtering stack-protector is a dumb idea ...
Comment 3 Yosef Meller 2005-08-18 01:54:42 UTC
Not filtered in 0.9.5 on x86 and gives the same problem.
Comment 4 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-18 09:04:19 UTC
linked to the upstream bug.
Comment 5 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-18 23:28:40 UTC
Ok, I confirmed the issue on x86 and talked at length with upstream about this.
 Their take on it is that it is purely a gcc-3 issue and that there is actually
no stack problems.  They say that gcc-4 doesn't have a problem with the code. 
I've filtered out the flag for gcc-3 in CVS.  resync/remerge to get it if you
have -fstack-protector in your CXXFLAGS.  No rev bump to save a compile for all
the rest of the people out there without that flag enabled.

Thanks for the bug report. (and thanks to the upstream devs for their patience)