First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 87902
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: ppc64 architecture team <ppc64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Konstantin Arkhipov <voxus@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 87902 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 87902 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-04-04 06:29 0000
Arches, please, mark net-dbs/bind{,-tools}-9.2.5 stable. 9.2.5 fixes all known
bugs to date in gentoo (refer to ChangeLogs for id's) and contains at least one
security fix since 9.2.2-r4.

------- Comment #1 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-04 07:25:32 0000 -------
stable on x86 and amd64

------- Comment #2 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-04-04 09:04:39 0000 -------
[ebuild  N    ] net-dns/bind-9.2.5  +berkdb +bind-mysql +caps +dlz +doc +idn
+ipv6 +ldap +mysql +odbc +postgres (-selinux) +ssl 0 kB

---->

Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) net-dns/bind-9.2.5 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) bind-9.2.5.tar.gz
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) dlz-9.2.5.patch.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking bind-9.2.5.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/bind-9.2.5/work
>>> Unpacking dlz-9.2.5.patch.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/bind-9.2.5/work
 * Applying dlz-9.2.5.patch.bz2 ...

 * Failed Patch: dlz-9.2.5.patch.bz2 !
 *  ( /var/tmp/portage/bind-9.2.5/temp/1667.patch )
 *
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 *
 *   /var/tmp/portage/bind-9.2.5/temp/dlz-9.2.5.patch.bz2-1667.out

------- Comment #3 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-04 09:46:17 0000 -------
Gustavo: thanks, that's fixed now. stupid bug, indeed. :-(

------- Comment #4 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-04-04 11:27:34 0000 -------
sparc done now, thanks :)

------- Comment #5 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-04-04 11:48:09 0000 -------
bind-tools-9.2.5 stable on ppc.

------- Comment #6 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-04 12:02:25 0000 -------
btw, bind and bind-tools should be in sync.

------- Comment #7 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-04-04 12:17:12 0000 -------
bind stable on ppc.

------- Comment #8 From René Nussbaumer 2005-04-04 13:18:35 0000 -------
This package was marked as stable by gmsoft. I remove hppa@g.o from the CC.

------- Comment #9 From Stewart (Blkdeath) 2005-04-04 18:30:49 0000 -------
Is there any reason you've required >=mysql-4 in the use flags section? This
package is masked (package.mask) and therefore prevents the upgrade of BIND on
systems with the mysql use flag. Thanks.

------- Comment #10 From Stewart (Blkdeath) 2005-04-04 18:34:20 0000 -------
My apologies. Outdated profile / mask file.

Is there, however, a specific reason to require MySQL 4? Are there any problems with 3, or any advantages to moving to 4 that would neccesitate such a change?

------- Comment #11 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-05 00:17:56 0000 -------
Stewart: mysql-3.23 is a bit outdated, imho. but, anyway, i'll check it.

------- Comment #12 From Markus Rothe 2005-04-05 08:39:18 0000 -------
I've some problems using bind (on ppc64) (never realy used it before..)

I've set up the chroot environment using "ebuild .. config". Now I edited /etc/conf.d/named: CPU="2". Then I try to start bind, but have some problems doing that:

G5 ~ # /etc/init.d/named start
 * Caching service dependencies ...                   [ ok ]
 * Starting chrooted named ...                        [ !! ]
G5 ~ # tail -n2 /var/log/messages 
Apr  5 15:35:10 G5 named[8692]: starting BIND 9.2.5 -u named -n 2 -t /chroot/dns
Apr  5 15:35:10 G5 named[8692]: using 1 CPU
G5 ~ # bind -u named -n 2 -t /chroot/dns
-bash: bind: -n: invalid option
bind: usage: bind [-lpvsPVS] [-m keymap] [-f filename] [-q name] [-u name] [-r keyseq] [-x keyseq:shell-command] [keyseq:readline-function or readline-command]
G5 ~ # 


So two problems:
- log shows "using 1 CPU" instead of 2
- bind doesn't use the -n option and fails to start

Any help for me? ;-)

------- Comment #13 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-05 09:16:06 0000 -------
Markus: i can't reproduce it on x86/amd64 boxes. please, recheck your settings.

shadanakar voxus # ebuild /var/db/pkg/net-dns/bind-9.2.5/bind-9.2.5.ebuild config
 *
 * Setting up the chroot directory... Done.
 *
 * Add the following to your root .bashrc or .bash_profile:
 *    alias rndc='rndc -k /chroot/dns/etc/bind/rndc.key'
 * Then do the following:
 *    source /root/.bashrc or .bash_profile
 *

shadanakar voxus # vi /etc/conf.d/named
shadanakar voxus # /etc/init.d/named start
 * Caching service dependencies ...                                                                                                    [ ok ]
 * Stopping chrooted named ...                                                                                                         [ ok ]
shadanakar voxus # tail -n 8 /var/log/messages
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: starting BIND 9.2.5 -u named -n 2 -t /chroot/dns
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: using 1 CPU
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: loading configuration from '/etc/bind/named.conf'
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: zone 127.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 2002081601
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: zone localhost/IN: loaded serial 2002081601
Apr  5 19:57:36 shadanakar named[15966]: running

but problem with only 1 processor usage is known - it's because of disabled threading in bind (grep thr bind-9.2.5.ebuild), because it's known to be buggy atm. i'm planning to enable it (via use flag) in next bump(s?) of 9.2.

------- Comment #14 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2005-04-06 03:11:23 0000 -------
Alpha done.

------- Comment #15 From Markus Rothe 2005-04-06 11:26:53 0000 -------
I just unmerged bind and deleted all configuration files, but that didn't
helped. I downgraded to latest stable version on ppc64 and all works fine.

I'll try to figure out, what is wrong with latest version, if I get some more
free time.

------- Comment #16 From Markus Rothe 2005-04-06 11:27:59 0000 -------
uh.. the first sentence should be: I just unmerged bind and deleted all
configuration files and reemerged bind, but that didn't helped.

------- Comment #17 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-07 05:17:38 0000 -------
ok, so 9.3 goes into testing now.
Markus: please, open separate bug, if that issue won't disappear. :-)

------- Comment #18 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-07 05:28:18 0000 -------
reopening for bind-tools stabilization

------- Comment #19 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-07 05:28:59 0000 -------
arm, ia64, s390, mips: please, mark stable bind-tools-9.2.5

------- Comment #20 From Joshua Kinard 2005-04-10 11:41:18 0000 -------
Stable on mips.

------- Comment #21 From SpanKY 2005-04-24 02:20:52 0000 -------
arm/ia64/s390 done

------- Comment #22 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-24 23:38:42 0000 -------
so only ppc remains.

------- Comment #23 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-04-25 05:55:19 0000 -------
bind-9.2.5 stable on ppc.

------- Comment #24 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-26 02:13:24 0000 -------
hansmi: what's about bind-tools-9.2.5 on ppc64? that's the last one.

close it, if bind-tools is ok on ppc64, please.

and thanks to everyone. :-)

------- Comment #25 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-04-26 09:59:03 0000 -------
voxus: ppc != ppc64. I don't have a ppc64 installation by now, so I'll forward
this to the ppc64 team.

------- Comment #26 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-04-27 00:22:06 0000 -------
ok, reassigning

------- Comment #27 From Daniel Ostrow 2005-05-07 20:37:29 0000 -------
ppc64 is taken care of.

------- Comment #28 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2005-05-08 09:23:17 0000 -------
uff. fixed at last. :-)

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug