Home | Docs | Forums | Lists | Bugs | Planet | Store | GMN | Get Gentoo!
View Bug Activity | Format For Printing | XML | Clone This Bug
When I try to compile digitemp 3.3.1 I get: ensima-gentoo digitemp-3.3.2 # emerge digitemp Calculating dependencies ...done! >>> emerge (1 of 1) app-misc/digitemp-3.3.1 to / >>> md5 src_uri ;-) digitemp-3.3.1.tar.gz >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking digitemp-3.3.1.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/digitemp-3.3.1/work >>> Source unpacked. rm -f *~ src/*~ userial/*~ userial/ds9097/*~ userial/ds9097u/*~ userial/ds2490/*~ rm -f src/digitemp.o src/device_name.o userial/crcutil.o userial/ioutil.o userial/swt1f.o userial/owerr.o userial/cnt1d.o userial/ad26.o userial/ds9097/ownet.o userial/ds9097/linuxlnk.o userial/ds9097/linuxses.o userial/ds9097/owtran.o src/ds9097.o userial/ds9097u/ds2480ut.o userial/ds9097u/ownetu.o userial/ds9097u/owllu.o userial/ds9097u/owsesu.o userial/ds9097u/owtrnu.o userial/ds9097u/linuxlnk.o src/ds9097u.o userial/ds2490/ownet.o userial/ds2490/owtran.o userial/ds2490/usblnk.o userial/ds2490/usbses.o src/ds2490.o rm -f core *.asc rm -f perl/*~ rrdb/*~ .digitemprc digitemp-3.3.1-1.spec rm -rf digitemp-3.3.1 * * making for ds9097u serial controller. if you would like support * for another controller, please set SERIAL_DRIVER="ds9097u" or * SERIAL_DRIVER="ds9097" as appropriate * gcc -I./src -I./userial -O2 -DLINUX -DLOCKDEV -c -o src/digitemp.o src/digitemp.c src/digitemp.c:379:21: lockdev.h: No such file or directory make: *** [src/digitemp.o] Błąd 1 >>> Test phase [not enabled]: app-misc/digitemp-3.3.1 >>> Install digitemp-3.3.1 into /var/tmp/portage/digitemp-3.3.1/image/ category app-misc >>> dobin: making digitemp executable... install: Could not stat on `digitemp': No such file or directory !!! ERROR: app-misc/digitemp-3.3.1 failed. As you can see there is no lockdev.h file, so I tried to search it in portage: ensima-gentoo digitemp-3.3.2 # emerge -S lockdev Searching... [ Results for search key : lockdev ] [ Applications found : 0 ] I search on google, and I've found these files: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/3/i386/lockdev-devel-1.0.1-4.1.i386.rpm http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/3/i386/lockdev-1.0.1-4.1.i386.rpm I've downloaded it and type: rpm2targz lockdev-devel-1.0.1-4.1.i386.rpm rpm2targz lockdev-1.0.1-4.1.i386.rpm Then I decompressed archives and copied files to directories (same as in tar.gz file). Next I typed "ldconfig", and "emerge digitemp", and I get: <cut> gcc -I./src -I./userial -O2 -DLINUX -DLOCKDEV -c -o userial/ds9097/linuxses.o userial/ds9097/linuxses.c gcc -I./src -I./userial -O2 -DLINUX -DLOCKDEV -c -o userial/ds9097/owtran.o userial/ds9097/owtran.c gcc -I./src -I./userial -O2 -DLINUX -DLOCKDEV -c -o src/ds9097.o src/ds9097.c gcc src/digitemp.o src/device_name.o userial/crcutil.o userial/ioutil.o userial/swt1f.o userial/owerr.o userial/cnt1d.o userial/ad26.o userial/ds9097/ownet.o userial/ds9097/linuxlnk.o userial/ds9097/linuxses.o userial/ds9097/owtran.o src/ds9097.o -o digitemp_DS9097 -lm -llockdev >>> Test phase [not enabled]: app-misc/digitemp-3.3.1 >>> Install digitemp-3.3.1 into /var/tmp/portage/digitemp-3.3.1/image/ category app-misc >>> dobin: making digitemp executable... install: Could not stat on `digitemp': No such file or directory !!! ERROR: app-misc/digitemp-3.3.1 failed. As we can see it now compiles cleanly, but cannot install. I've made a patch for digitemp-3.3.1.ebuild file. <patch starts here> --- digitemp-3.3.1.ebuild 2005-03-26 00:30:42.356942904 +0100 +++ digitemp-3.3.1_good.ebuild 2005-03-26 00:22:53.000000000 +0100 @@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ # passive ds9097. the ds9097u setting is what i have, so probably a safe # default - nothing special here. - local target="ds9097u" + target="ds9097u" [ "${SERIAL_DRIVER}" = ds9097 ] && target="ds9097" make clean @@ -32,5 +32,11 @@ src_install() { - dobin digitemp || die + + case "$target" in + "ds9097") target="DS9097" ;; + "ds9097u") target="DS9097U" ;; + esac + + dobin digitemp_$target || die dodoc README FAQ TODO <end of patch> Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Expected Results: It now compiles cleanly, but I cant find lockdev in portage - is it there ? If no maybe someone could make a ebuild. And I propose to add lockdev to depends of digitemp 3.3.1.
Maybe it's time to make ebuild for 3.3.2 too.
ceho, I don't use this package, and I'm not sure who does -- if you would like to be its maintainer via proxy (ie, me) then that arrangement would be well. Would you like to submit an ebuild for the version bump,and be the proxy-maintainer?
The problem is that there is no lockdev package in the portage (or I can't find it), but I also can't find homepage of this lib (only rpms or debian packages). I would like to be a maintainer of digitemp, so I'll submit ebuild in a few days, but like I said it depends on liblockdev, and this is the problem.
Created an attachment (id=54753) [edit] ebuild for digitemp-3.3.2 This is digitemp-3.3.2 ebuild - no lockdev support for now.
Created an attachment (id=54783) [edit] Next version of ebuild I've patched stupid language error ;)
ceho, I'm sorry for not responding -- I've been slightly short on time. I will try and get this into portage in the next few days (friday or monday/tuesday) and list you in the metadata as the maintainer-by-proxy.
ceho -- couple of notes: please stop attaching tarballs to bugzilla. I don't look at attached tarballs at all. As a matter of policy, we require only plaintext attachments for ebuilds and patches. I don't need ChangeLog, metadata, digest or any of that, just ebuild and patch. Please reattach (and also -- do you have an ebuild for liblockdev, or is there some other bug report with it attached?).
Created an attachment (id=55484) [edit] Ebuild for digitemp 3.3.2 Sorry for tarballs. I'm attaching plaintext version of ebuild, and in the next attachment a patch which is needed by this ebuild.
Created an attachment (id=55485) [edit] patch needed to compile without liblockdev Here is a patch that is needed by the ebuild. For now there is now lockdev support, I can add this feature when liblockdev will appear in portage. "lockdev" flag is for future use.
ceho, will you make an ebuild for liblockdev then?
I don't know. It could be difficult, because it may conflict with portage mechanism (it already uses /var/lock). I hope that someone else could make an liblockdev ebuild, so I've made an lockdev flag for future use.
ceho, what does lockdev actually do?
It is a library which locks device when a proces is accessing it. This prevents from accessing multiple processes same device in one time.
So what with the ebuild ? Will it be added to portage ?
thanks ceho, version bumped. I didn't bother with the lockdev USE flag -- we'll revisit as and when necessary (once lockdev is in portage, if it ever makes it).
