Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 8313
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: SpanKY <vapier@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Chris Moeller <kode54@earthlink.net>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 8313 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 8313 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2002-09-24 10:54 0000
1080c doesn't appear to be a stand-alone patch.


The server browser is obviously missing the jittery sorting fix, which is part 
of the 1080b update. Apparently, they decided not to make 1080c a cumulative 
patch.

I have already made an ebuild myself, the process is as simple as applying both 
patches in order, but I leave that up to you in the event that you find a 
cleaner way of arranging the ebuild. I'll upload and link later if it becomes 
necessary.

------- Comment #1 From SpanKY 2002-09-24 16:49:15 0000 -------
if you post the ebuild we'll take a look at it

------- Comment #2 From SpanKY 2002-09-25 10:57:47 0000 -------
phoenix: im stealing this one since (1) i put out the 1080c patch and (2) i 
have an ebuild that works

------- Comment #3 From phoen][x 2002-09-25 12:46:49 0000 -------
Heyas Spanky,

you didnt change too much did you? I looked into the ebuild but i was unable to
find any new, major enhancements (no offense there) - if you implemented a major
change (layout,whatever..) please tell me. Sorry for not taking care of that
stuff myself, i lost 512MB ram yesterday so i had quite some downtime (crappy
noname ram, dont you ever buy that). Thanks for your help,

-phoen][x-
besides, what do you mean with "(2) i have an ebuild that works" - mine worked,
didnt it?

------- Comment #4 From SpanKY 2002-09-25 12:54:10 0000 -------
i just abstracted your code ...
basically i defined 'PATCH1' and 'PATCH2' and rewrote bits in a for loop ...
for PATCH in $PATCH1 $PATCH2 ; do
   <patch code>
done

i use a lot of noname ram ;)
well, pc133 i do ... got about 2+gigs of it in 2 servers
my desktop though has the good stuff for pc333 :D

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug