First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 80506
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Portage team <dev-portage@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
vpopmail.log NOCOLOR="true" emerge vpopmail -d --nodeps &> vpopmail.log text/plain Tuan Van (RETIRED) 2005-02-02 15:33 0000 76.66 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 80506 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 80506 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-02-02 13:00 0000
Don't have the specific error message (on a different box), but vpopmail will
not merge if portage runs as a non-privileged user.  Configure will die with an
error stating that its configure must be run as the root user right at the tail
end.  Removing 'userpriv' and 'usersandbox' from FEATURES resolved the issue.

------- Comment #1 From Tuan Van (RETIRED) 2005-02-02 14:07:40 0000 -------
portage bug?

# grep RESTRICT /usr/portage/net-mail/vpopmail/*.ebuild
/usr/portage/net-mail/vpopmail/vpopmail-5.4.0-r1.ebuild:RESTRICT="nouserpriv"
/usr/portage/net-mail/vpopmail/vpopmail-5.4.6-r1.ebuild:RESTRICT="nouserpriv"

------- Comment #2 From Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) 2005-02-02 15:05:05 0000 -------
What portage version?
emerge info

The output would be helpful, and also another run with: emerge -d vpopmail

------- Comment #3 From Tuan Van (RETIRED) 2005-02-02 15:33:36 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=50239) [edit]
NOCOLOR="true" emerge vpopmail -d --nodeps &> vpopmail.log

# emerge info
Portage 2.0.51-r15 (default-linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3,
glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r0, 2.6.10-gentoo-r4 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.10-gentoo-r4 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.9
Python: 	     dev-lang/python-2.3.4 [2.3.4 (#1, Jan 24 2005, 11:09:45)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.6.3, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r2
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env
/usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache cvs distlocks parallel-fetch prelink
sandbox sfperms sign strict userpriv usersandbox verify-rdepend"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org"
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/portage/overlay"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.namerica.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X aalib apache2 avi berkdb bitmap-fonts crypt dba encode f77 fam flac
font-server foomaticdb fortran gd gd-external gdbm gif hal imlib ipv6 java jpeg
kde libg++ libwww mikmod mmx mpeg mysql ncurses nls opengl pam pdflib perl png
postgres python qt readline real samba sdl session slang spell sse ssl tcpd
tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode xml2 xmms xv zlib"
Unset:	ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS

------- Comment #4 From Brian Harring 2005-02-03 09:44:45 0000 -------
Conversion over to supporting RESTRICT="userpriv" horked it (logic error),
corrected in portage stable cvs.

------- Comment #5 From Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) 2005-02-03 10:00:33 0000 -------
Having both userpriv and nouserpriv in RESTRICT is a temp fix.

------- Comment #6 From Robin Johnson 2005-02-20 22:00:27 0000 -------
I've put in the workaround of having both userpriv and nouserpriv in RESTRICT.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug