First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 77626
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo X packagers <x11@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: SpanKY <vapier@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
xorg-x11-nocxx.patch allow to build xorg-x11 if ttmkfdir is not installed (nocxx) patch Peter S. Mazinger 2005-05-28 05:00 0000 2.81 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 77626 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 77626 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-01-11 22:13 0000 
per our discussion on irc, xorg-x11 should:

DEPEND="!nocxx? ( ttmkfdir )"

you mentioned that the ebuild has a lot of ttmkfdir code that'll need touching up to work with mkfontscale

thanks !

------- Comment #1 From Donnie Berkholz 2005-01-11 22:24:47 0000 ------- 
Also as mentioned, a supplied ebuild patch should make things happen faster, as
my time is unfortunately at a premium these days.

------- Comment #2 From Donnie Berkholz 2005-01-13 16:22:39 0000 ------- 
It's a pretty easy idea -- basically, wherever in the ebuild ttmkfdir gets
used, mkfontscale should be used instead if USE=nocxx. The options needing to
be passed to it are already elsewhere in the ebuild.

Assigning to embedded for patch. Please reassign once a patch is attached.

------- Comment #3 From solar 2005-02-03 10:16:40 0000 ------- 
Peter do you wish to attach a patch to this bug?

------- Comment #4 From Peter S. Mazinger 2005-05-28 05:00:20 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=60007) [edit]
allow to build xorg-x11 if ttmkfdir is not installed (nocxx)

------- Comment #5 From Donnie Berkholz 2005-06-27 23:04:14 0000 ------- 
That dependency reordering is totally out of place on this bug. Please file a
new bug for that. Stick Keywords: Inclusion in it, so we get to it quickly.

I've committed the part of the patch relevant to this bug to 6.8.2-r2 and
6.8.99.13. Thanks, and sorry for the delay.

------- Comment #6 From Peter S. Mazinger 2005-06-28 01:03:24 0000 ------- 
It was only a kindly gesture to correct the dependencies too (because if I ever
touch an ebuild I correct what I find there). If this is not ok w/ you and
you can't accept these changes as-is, sorry, no new bug for it...
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug