Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 75119
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Simone Scanzoni <nonno.cicala@libero.it>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild text/plain Simone Scanzoni 2004-12-20 17:18 0000 866 bytes Details
libieee1284-0.2.8-dbjh-v4.diff dbjh-v4 : The author of this patch says it should fix some bugs patch Simone Scanzoni 2004-12-20 17:20 0000 27.92 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 75119 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 75119 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-12-20 17:16 0000 
Version 0.2.1 (newest stable ebuild) was too old for my parallel scanner (
Canon CanoScanFB620P ) to work, so I looked for the latest stable version at
SourceForge ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/libieee1284/ ) and applied a
non-official patch seen there (it should fix some bugs), attached below, which
also adds a dependency to autoconf(-2.58 is the version tested by the
developer).
I can't test my ebuild on an amd64 , so I left that arch out ( -amd64 , should
I set it to ~amd64 instead?).

I hope it would help someone else,
   Simone

------- Comment #1 From Simone Scanzoni 2004-12-20 17:18:37 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=46497) [details]
libieee1284-0.2.8.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Simone Scanzoni 2004-12-20 17:20:40 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=46498) [details]
libieee1284-0.2.8 : The author of this patch says it should fix some bugs

------- Comment #3 From Robin Johnson 2005-01-16 14:49:59 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 53971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From Robin Johnson 2005-01-16 15:23:53 0000 ------- 
in cvs.

------- Comment #5 From Jim Dabell 2006-11-16 19:50:20 0000 ------- 
This has been in cvs but masked by ~x86 for a couple of years now.  0.2.10 has
been out for a year and a half too.  Is there any chance of at least getting
0.2.8 unmasked?  My scanner simply doesn't work with 0.2.1.

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2006-11-16 21:41:53 0000 ------- 
you file new bugs for new issues

------- Comment #7 From Jim Dabell 2006-11-17 10:40:53 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #6)
> you file new bugs for new issues
> 

But this isn't a new issue.  It's the same issue, it just hasn't been resolved.
 Could you reopen this bug please?

------- Comment #8 From SpanKY 2007-06-17 21:13:01 0000 ------- 
it is a new issue, we handle stabilization sep from version bump
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug