First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 69181
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Steph L <linux4ibook@free.fr>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 69181 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 69181 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-10-27 13:10 0000 
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-October/024959.html
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-October/024964.html

Initial post about the problem : 
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0410&L=mailscanner&T=0&F=&S=&P=126285



Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-10-27 13:40:34 0000 ------- 
Perl team, please bump.

------- Comment #2 From Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2004-10-28 03:19:58 0000 ------- 
Added. Tested on sparc and x86, so I can unmask there, but will need other
archs before continuing.

------- Comment #3 From Jochen Maes (RETIRED) 2004-10-28 04:51:15 0000 ------- 
stable on ppc
also had to mark MIME-Base64-3.05 stable or repoman complained... (poor thing)

greetings

------- Comment #4 From Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2004-10-28 05:40:37 0000 ------- 
ok, marked stable on x86 and sparc (should have done it to begin with, sorry
folks)

------- Comment #5 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2004-10-30 03:03:50 0000 ------- 
Eek! for some reason I forgot to mention that I stabled MIME-tools on alpha
yesterday..

------- Comment #6 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-11-01 02:27:11 0000 ------- 
Do we need a GLSA ? This one is much like the Archive-Zip thing (allow virus
detection evasion on some mail scanning systems)... and we issued one for that.

------- Comment #7 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2004-11-01 03:02:06 0000 ------- 
I think we should issue a GLSA for this one as well.

------- Comment #8 From Santiago Gala 2004-11-01 05:09:42 0000 ------- 
This version breaks tests (and thus ebuild) of SOAP-Lite. SOAP-Lite builds with
5.413 and 5.414, though

Also, while 5.415 is labelled "ppc", 5.414 is labelled "~ppc", which looks
funny.

------- Comment #9 From Michael Cummings (RETIRED) 2004-11-02 03:23:06 0000 ------- 
We asked ppc to test and unmask this version - hence the jump.

It does *not* break SOAP-Lite-60a-r1. There was a mistake in the ebuild which I corrected this morning and retested. SOAP-Lite-60a-r1 works fine with 5.413 and up, including 5.415. If you can pass me some code that doesn't work I'd be happy to test it out. The tests will fail with the flush because of a flaw in the tests themselves, not SOAP-Lite/MIME-tools interaction.

------- Comment #10 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2004-11-02 04:08:03 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable

------- Comment #11 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-11-02 10:25:36 0000 ------- 
GLSA 200411-06
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug