Bug 68201 – Gthumb 2.6.0 is out

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Marcos González 2004-10-19 14:08:48 UTC]

The 2.6.0 is out, I installed it via renaming the 2.4.2 ebuild, and compiled without problems. In portage, stable version is still 2.2.1 from january... seems to need 'some' version bumping.

[Comment 1 Marcos González 2004-10-19 14:26:34 UTC]

Created attachment 42225 [details]
gthumb-2.6.0.ebuild

Just the renamed ebuild, if you want to save time and copy-paste

[Comment 2 Marcos González 2004-10-19 14:27:47 UTC]

Comment on attachment 42225 [details]
gthumb-2.6.0.ebuild

Just the renamed ebuild, if you want to save time and copy-paste

[Comment 3 Marcos González 2004-10-19 14:28:56 UTC]

Sorry i failed to edit the ebuild once submitted. The header must be changed to sync with the version: 2.6.0

[Comment 4 Eddy Mulyono 2004-10-20 08:10:32 UTC]

You should update the RDEPEND in the ebuild to:

RDEPEND=">=dev-libs/glib-2.4
	>=x11-libs/gtk+-2.4
	>=dev-libs/libxml2-2.4
	>=gnome-base/libgnome-2.6
	>=gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.6
	>=gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.6
	>=gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.6
	>=gnome-base/libglade-2.4
	>=gnome-base/libgnomeprint-2.6
	>=gnome-base/libgnomeprintui-2.6
	>=gnome-base/libbonobo-2.6
	>=gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.6
	png? ( media-libs/libpng )
	tiff? ( media-libs/tiff )
	jpeg? ( media-libs/jpeg
		>=media-libs/libexif-0.5.12 )
	gphoto2? ( >=media-libs/libgphoto2-2.1.3 )"

(have a peek in gthumb-2.6.0.tar.gz/gthumb-2.6.0/configure.in line 22 and above).

[Comment 5 Eddy Mulyono 2004-10-21 23:47:26 UTC]

Created attachment 42398 [details]
gthumb-2.6.0.1.ebuild

* Version bump to 2.6.0.1
* Updated ${DEPEND}

[Comment 6 Ernst Sjöstrand 2004-10-31 04:20:12 UTC]

Nice ebuild. Hope it gets included soon.

[Comment 7 Marcos González 2004-11-02 13:10:10 UTC]

The 2.6.0.1 version corrects a really nasty bug that didn't allow to save images when edited, telling you hadn't the needed permisions. Now works fine and stable on my system.

[Comment 8 Xake 2004-11-17 10:57:41 UTC]

I think it is a good question why portage have not been bumped? 2.4.2 has at least been in portage for a while, and I think it can be marked much more stable than 2.2.1.

Thanks anyway for the ebuild. Going to try it out and just wait and see when someone in the gentoo-team gives him/herself the time to bump portage.

[Comment 9 gad.kadosh 2004-11-19 07:46:11 UTC]

I was about to send a bug about not putting 2.4.2 in stable, and just found this bug report - i ddidn't even know there was a newer gthumb. I had to use 2.4.2 because it works with my digicam and 2.2 does not

[Comment 10 Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-11-19 18:01:36 UTC]

I've added 2.6.0.1 to CVS now, thanks guys.