First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 66813
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) <karltk@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
eclipse-diff A diff to the pre1 version of the ebuild patch Paul de Vrieze 2004-10-08 15:01 0000 9.08 KB Details | Diff
new-eclipse-patch New version of the patch patch Paul de Vrieze 2004-10-09 10:35 0000 9.13 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 66813 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 66813 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-10-08 14:57 0000 
After quite some fiddling I managed to hack the ebuild far enough to get it
compiling. After initially getting only gtk and not motif/mozilla/kdebindings
working I have it now all working ;-)

------- Comment #1 From Paul de Vrieze 2004-10-08 15:01:29 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=41396) [edit]
A diff to the pre1 version of the ebuild

Quite some hacks getting eclipse to work ;-)

------- Comment #2 From Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) 2004-10-08 15:59:08 0000 ------- 
Great! I'll have a look tomorrow. Thanks a lot!

------- Comment #3 From Paul de Vrieze 2004-10-09 10:35:48 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=41428) [edit]
New version of the patch

The old patch is broken. In someway the omission of an include path for jni.h
caused no problem on home system. Trying to compile on my office computer
showed that this omission caused a problem. The new patch fixes this.

------- Comment #4 From Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) 2004-10-09 14:44:50 0000 ------- 
Even better:) 

I have rewritten 3.0.1-r1 today, so that the ebuild in general is a lot cleaner.
I will try to merge your stuff with the rewrite. If, however, you decide to
make another update to your patch, please consider basing it on 3.0.1-r1 instead.

------- Comment #5 From Paul de Vrieze 2004-10-10 07:49:33 0000 ------- 
I agree with you that the ebuild is quite ugly. I'll probably not make a new
version (as I have it installed now), but I could attach a diff to the 3.0.1
version. I don't think however that it would help you much ;-)

------- Comment #6 From Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) 2004-10-31 11:15:47 0000 ------- 
Merged and committed. Try the _pre2.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug